This thesis reviews and critically analyses the Australian law and procedure relating to the offence of contempt in the face of the court and, in particular,its impact on people with mental health issues. The fundamental argument advanced in this thesis is that the law and procedure of contempt in the faceof the court should be reformed in order to take into account the mental health of people accused of contempt. The thesis proposes reforms to thelegal principles and procedures governing contempt in the face of the court that are designed to achieve that objective. The thesis also examines judicial administration, particularly the dynamic between judge and alleged contemnor. It recommends continuing improvement in mental health literacy among members of the judiciary, along with new policies and programs to build and reinforce referral pathways from the courts to mental health services for contemnors. It also examines the issue of judicial stress and, in some instances, mental ill-health among members of the judiciary, to highlight that the power to commit for contempt can be abused by judicial officers experiencing work-related stress and/or mental ill-health. It is then demonstrated that the reforms proposed in the thesis are not only consistent with Australia’s human rights obligations, but also will help to ensure the due administration of justice.
|Date of Award||2016|
|Supervisor||Richard Bigwood (Supervisor) & Kenneth Levy (Supervisor)|