Written submissions

Lee Stuesser

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Extract:
The principles of good advocacy do not change in terms of written submissions. It remains fundamental that your arguments be clear and concise. Lengthy and
convoluted submissions will not impress the judge. Increasingly the courts are
looking for written materials to augment any oral arguments. The courts in
Australia for a long time resisted the move towards written argument. They
followed the English practice. Sir Harry Gibbs described the practice in the High
Court of receiving written outlines of argument, which were to be no more than
three pages in length, at the start of the appeal hearing. That has now changed. The practice in the High Court is now to receive written submissions in advance and these are to be no more than 20 pages in length. Australia is moving towards the North American practice, which places far more emphasis on written material for all matter of hearings - not just appeals. It is common in North America for written briefs to be provided on motion hearings, written arguments to be provided at trials and written factums are required on appeals.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAn introduction to advocacy
EditorsL. Stuesser
Place of PublicationPyrmont
PublisherThomson Reuters (Prous Science)
Pages73-80
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9780455227580
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Hearing
Length
Advocacy
Fundamental

Cite this

Stuesser, L. (2011). Written submissions. In L. Stuesser (Ed.), An introduction to advocacy (pp. 73-80). Pyrmont: Thomson Reuters (Prous Science).
Stuesser, Lee. / Written submissions. An introduction to advocacy. editor / L. Stuesser. Pyrmont : Thomson Reuters (Prous Science), 2011. pp. 73-80
@inbook{eee79794042048ed858fbb8d4350419b,
title = "Written submissions",
abstract = "Extract:The principles of good advocacy do not change in terms of written submissions. It remains fundamental that your arguments be clear and concise. Lengthy andconvoluted submissions will not impress the judge. Increasingly the courts arelooking for written materials to augment any oral arguments. The courts inAustralia for a long time resisted the move towards written argument. Theyfollowed the English practice. Sir Harry Gibbs described the practice in the HighCourt of receiving written outlines of argument, which were to be no more thanthree pages in length, at the start of the appeal hearing. That has now changed. The practice in the High Court is now to receive written submissions in advance and these are to be no more than 20 pages in length. Australia is moving towards the North American practice, which places far more emphasis on written material for all matter of hearings - not just appeals. It is common in North America for written briefs to be provided on motion hearings, written arguments to be provided at trials and written factums are required on appeals.",
author = "Lee Stuesser",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780455227580",
pages = "73--80",
editor = "Stuesser, {L. }",
booktitle = "An introduction to advocacy",
publisher = "Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)",
address = "United States",

}

Stuesser, L 2011, Written submissions. in L Stuesser (ed.), An introduction to advocacy. Thomson Reuters (Prous Science), Pyrmont, pp. 73-80.

Written submissions. / Stuesser, Lee.

An introduction to advocacy. ed. / L. Stuesser. Pyrmont : Thomson Reuters (Prous Science), 2011. p. 73-80.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Written submissions

AU - Stuesser, Lee

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Extract:The principles of good advocacy do not change in terms of written submissions. It remains fundamental that your arguments be clear and concise. Lengthy andconvoluted submissions will not impress the judge. Increasingly the courts arelooking for written materials to augment any oral arguments. The courts inAustralia for a long time resisted the move towards written argument. Theyfollowed the English practice. Sir Harry Gibbs described the practice in the HighCourt of receiving written outlines of argument, which were to be no more thanthree pages in length, at the start of the appeal hearing. That has now changed. The practice in the High Court is now to receive written submissions in advance and these are to be no more than 20 pages in length. Australia is moving towards the North American practice, which places far more emphasis on written material for all matter of hearings - not just appeals. It is common in North America for written briefs to be provided on motion hearings, written arguments to be provided at trials and written factums are required on appeals.

AB - Extract:The principles of good advocacy do not change in terms of written submissions. It remains fundamental that your arguments be clear and concise. Lengthy andconvoluted submissions will not impress the judge. Increasingly the courts arelooking for written materials to augment any oral arguments. The courts inAustralia for a long time resisted the move towards written argument. Theyfollowed the English practice. Sir Harry Gibbs described the practice in the HighCourt of receiving written outlines of argument, which were to be no more thanthree pages in length, at the start of the appeal hearing. That has now changed. The practice in the High Court is now to receive written submissions in advance and these are to be no more than 20 pages in length. Australia is moving towards the North American practice, which places far more emphasis on written material for all matter of hearings - not just appeals. It is common in North America for written briefs to be provided on motion hearings, written arguments to be provided at trials and written factums are required on appeals.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780455227580

SP - 73

EP - 80

BT - An introduction to advocacy

A2 - Stuesser, L.

PB - Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)

CY - Pyrmont

ER -

Stuesser L. Written submissions. In Stuesser L, editor, An introduction to advocacy. Pyrmont: Thomson Reuters (Prous Science). 2011. p. 73-80