Working the Nexus: Teaching students to think, read and problem-solve like a lawyer

Kathrine Galloway, Mary Heath, Alex Steel, Anne Hewitt, Mark Israel, Natalie Skead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Extract: The nature and purpose of Australian legal education has changed over time but it is at least arguable that one constant has been the importance of law students learning to think: more particularly, learning to think ‘like lawyers’. Despite agreement on thinking as a fundamental legal skill, giving content to this concept has generated debate within the academy and the profession. There is also some debate about why the many law students who will never be lawyers need to learn to think like lawyers. Further, even if there were agreement on what ‘thinking like a lawyer’ really means, how to teach legal thinking effectively remains relatively obscure.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-114
Number of pages119
JournalLegal Education Review
Volume26
Issue number1&2
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

lawyer
Teaching
student
Law
learning
academy
profession
education

Cite this

Galloway, K., Heath, M., Steel, A., Hewitt, A., Israel, M., & Skead, N. (2016). Working the Nexus: Teaching students to think, read and problem-solve like a lawyer. Legal Education Review, 26(1&2), 95-114.
Galloway, Kathrine ; Heath, Mary ; Steel, Alex ; Hewitt, Anne ; Israel, Mark ; Skead, Natalie. / Working the Nexus : Teaching students to think, read and problem-solve like a lawyer. In: Legal Education Review. 2016 ; Vol. 26, No. 1&2. pp. 95-114.
@article{56fe172ddef44fe2aa25ed90ed3af410,
title = "Working the Nexus: Teaching students to think, read and problem-solve like a lawyer",
abstract = "Extract: The nature and purpose of Australian legal education has changed over time but it is at least arguable that one constant has been the importance of law students learning to think: more particularly, learning to think ‘like lawyers’. Despite agreement on thinking as a fundamental legal skill, giving content to this concept has generated debate within the academy and the profession. There is also some debate about why the many law students who will never be lawyers need to learn to think like lawyers. Further, even if there were agreement on what ‘thinking like a lawyer’ really means, how to teach legal thinking effectively remains relatively obscure.",
author = "Kathrine Galloway and Mary Heath and Alex Steel and Anne Hewitt and Mark Israel and Natalie Skead",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "95--114",
journal = "Legal Education Review",
issn = "1033-2839",
number = "1&2",

}

Galloway, K, Heath, M, Steel, A, Hewitt, A, Israel, M & Skead, N 2016, 'Working the Nexus: Teaching students to think, read and problem-solve like a lawyer' Legal Education Review, vol. 26, no. 1&2, pp. 95-114.

Working the Nexus : Teaching students to think, read and problem-solve like a lawyer. / Galloway, Kathrine; Heath, Mary; Steel, Alex; Hewitt, Anne ; Israel, Mark; Skead, Natalie.

In: Legal Education Review, Vol. 26, No. 1&2, 2016, p. 95-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Working the Nexus

T2 - Teaching students to think, read and problem-solve like a lawyer

AU - Galloway, Kathrine

AU - Heath, Mary

AU - Steel, Alex

AU - Hewitt, Anne

AU - Israel, Mark

AU - Skead, Natalie

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Extract: The nature and purpose of Australian legal education has changed over time but it is at least arguable that one constant has been the importance of law students learning to think: more particularly, learning to think ‘like lawyers’. Despite agreement on thinking as a fundamental legal skill, giving content to this concept has generated debate within the academy and the profession. There is also some debate about why the many law students who will never be lawyers need to learn to think like lawyers. Further, even if there were agreement on what ‘thinking like a lawyer’ really means, how to teach legal thinking effectively remains relatively obscure.

AB - Extract: The nature and purpose of Australian legal education has changed over time but it is at least arguable that one constant has been the importance of law students learning to think: more particularly, learning to think ‘like lawyers’. Despite agreement on thinking as a fundamental legal skill, giving content to this concept has generated debate within the academy and the profession. There is also some debate about why the many law students who will never be lawyers need to learn to think like lawyers. Further, even if there were agreement on what ‘thinking like a lawyer’ really means, how to teach legal thinking effectively remains relatively obscure.

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 95

EP - 114

JO - Legal Education Review

JF - Legal Education Review

SN - 1033-2839

IS - 1&2

ER -