Wither covenants in Queensland in the name of sustainability?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The law relevant to covenants has been described as a "blundering conceptualist jungle for of semantic swamps" which this chapter will attempt as far as possible to avoid. Covenants have always occupied an uncomfortable space in Australia based upon the limited ability to register these interests under the relevant Torrens title statutes. Covenants have been accommodated in many jurisdictions by permitting the notification of covenants. This situation has most likely resulted from the fact that the Torrens system was first developed at a time when the concept of covenants began to take shape after the impetus provided by Tulk v Moxhay in 1848. This has resulted in varied responses from different jurisdictions but generally these provisions have not adequately dealt with the difficulties that arise in the application of covenants under the Torrens system These problems have in Queensland recently been made worse by the intrusion of concepts relevant to sustainable housing in relation to covenants which has not only cast further doubt on the already doubtful role of covenants in Queensland but has raised the level of complexity applying to these interests.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProperty and Sustainability
Subtitle of host publicationSelected essays
EditorsP Carruthers, S Mascher, N Skead
Place of PublicationPyrmont, NSW
PublisherThomson Reuters (Prous Science)
Pages145-158
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9780455229515
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

jurisdiction
sustainability
statute
housing
semantics
Law
ability
time

Cite this

Weir, M. (2011). Wither covenants in Queensland in the name of sustainability? In P. Carruthers, S. Mascher, & N. Skead (Eds.), Property and Sustainability: Selected essays (pp. 145-158). Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters (Prous Science).
Weir, Michael. / Wither covenants in Queensland in the name of sustainability?. Property and Sustainability: Selected essays. editor / P Carruthers ; S Mascher ; N Skead. Pyrmont, NSW : Thomson Reuters (Prous Science), 2011. pp. 145-158
@inbook{b9456c5082e14e1a825208ab9415f81a,
title = "Wither covenants in Queensland in the name of sustainability?",
abstract = "The law relevant to covenants has been described as a {"}blundering conceptualist jungle for of semantic swamps{"} which this chapter will attempt as far as possible to avoid. Covenants have always occupied an uncomfortable space in Australia based upon the limited ability to register these interests under the relevant Torrens title statutes. Covenants have been accommodated in many jurisdictions by permitting the notification of covenants. This situation has most likely resulted from the fact that the Torrens system was first developed at a time when the concept of covenants began to take shape after the impetus provided by Tulk v Moxhay in 1848. This has resulted in varied responses from different jurisdictions but generally these provisions have not adequately dealt with the difficulties that arise in the application of covenants under the Torrens system These problems have in Queensland recently been made worse by the intrusion of concepts relevant to sustainable housing in relation to covenants which has not only cast further doubt on the already doubtful role of covenants in Queensland but has raised the level of complexity applying to these interests.",
author = "Michael Weir",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780455229515",
pages = "145--158",
editor = "P Carruthers and S Mascher and N Skead",
booktitle = "Property and Sustainability",
publisher = "Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)",
address = "United States",

}

Weir, M 2011, Wither covenants in Queensland in the name of sustainability? in P Carruthers, S Mascher & N Skead (eds), Property and Sustainability: Selected essays. Thomson Reuters (Prous Science), Pyrmont, NSW, pp. 145-158.

Wither covenants in Queensland in the name of sustainability? / Weir, Michael.

Property and Sustainability: Selected essays. ed. / P Carruthers; S Mascher; N Skead. Pyrmont, NSW : Thomson Reuters (Prous Science), 2011. p. 145-158.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Wither covenants in Queensland in the name of sustainability?

AU - Weir, Michael

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The law relevant to covenants has been described as a "blundering conceptualist jungle for of semantic swamps" which this chapter will attempt as far as possible to avoid. Covenants have always occupied an uncomfortable space in Australia based upon the limited ability to register these interests under the relevant Torrens title statutes. Covenants have been accommodated in many jurisdictions by permitting the notification of covenants. This situation has most likely resulted from the fact that the Torrens system was first developed at a time when the concept of covenants began to take shape after the impetus provided by Tulk v Moxhay in 1848. This has resulted in varied responses from different jurisdictions but generally these provisions have not adequately dealt with the difficulties that arise in the application of covenants under the Torrens system These problems have in Queensland recently been made worse by the intrusion of concepts relevant to sustainable housing in relation to covenants which has not only cast further doubt on the already doubtful role of covenants in Queensland but has raised the level of complexity applying to these interests.

AB - The law relevant to covenants has been described as a "blundering conceptualist jungle for of semantic swamps" which this chapter will attempt as far as possible to avoid. Covenants have always occupied an uncomfortable space in Australia based upon the limited ability to register these interests under the relevant Torrens title statutes. Covenants have been accommodated in many jurisdictions by permitting the notification of covenants. This situation has most likely resulted from the fact that the Torrens system was first developed at a time when the concept of covenants began to take shape after the impetus provided by Tulk v Moxhay in 1848. This has resulted in varied responses from different jurisdictions but generally these provisions have not adequately dealt with the difficulties that arise in the application of covenants under the Torrens system These problems have in Queensland recently been made worse by the intrusion of concepts relevant to sustainable housing in relation to covenants which has not only cast further doubt on the already doubtful role of covenants in Queensland but has raised the level of complexity applying to these interests.

UR - http://legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/property-sustainability-selected-essays/productdetail/111297

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780455229515

SP - 145

EP - 158

BT - Property and Sustainability

A2 - Carruthers, P

A2 - Mascher, S

A2 - Skead, N

PB - Thomson Reuters (Prous Science)

CY - Pyrmont, NSW

ER -

Weir M. Wither covenants in Queensland in the name of sustainability? In Carruthers P, Mascher S, Skead N, editors, Property and Sustainability: Selected essays. Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters (Prous Science). 2011. p. 145-158