Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability

A. Mike Burton*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

151 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite many years of research, there has been surprisingly little progress in our understanding of how faces are identified. Here I argue that there are two contributory factors: (a) Our methods have obscured a critical aspect of the problem, within-person variability; and (b) research has tended to conflate familiar and unfamiliar face processing. Examples of procedures for studying variability are given, and a case is made for studying real faces, of the type people recognize every day. I argue that face recognition (specifically identification) may only be understood by adopting new techniques that acknowledge statistical patterns in the visual environment. As a consequence, some of our current methods will need to be abandoned.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1467-1485
Number of pages19
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume66
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this