Why ADR must be a mandatory subject in the law degree: A cheat sheet for the willing and a primer for the non-believer

James Duffy, Rachael M Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The profession of law is deeply steeped in tradition and conservatism, which influences the content and pedagogy employed in law faculties across Australia. Indeed, the practice of law and the institutions of legal education are in a relationship of mutual influence; a dénouement which preserves the best aspects of the common law legal system, but also leaves the way we educate, practice and think about the role of law resistant to change. In this article, the authors lay down a challenge to legal education orthodoxy and a call to arms for legal academic progressivists: that alternative dispute resolution (ADR) should be a compulsory, stand alone subject in the law degree. The authors put forward 10 simple arguments as to why every law student should be exposed to a semester-long course of ADR instruction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9-19
Number of pages11
JournalAustralasian Dispute Resolution Journal
Volume25
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Law
common law
conservatism
legal system
semester
education
profession
instruction
student

Cite this

@article{06e8a4fd634f415aaf97e45f74c70f18,
title = "Why ADR must be a mandatory subject in the law degree: A cheat sheet for the willing and a primer for the non-believer",
abstract = "The profession of law is deeply steeped in tradition and conservatism, which influences the content and pedagogy employed in law faculties across Australia. Indeed, the practice of law and the institutions of legal education are in a relationship of mutual influence; a d{\'e}nouement which preserves the best aspects of the common law legal system, but also leaves the way we educate, practice and think about the role of law resistant to change. In this article, the authors lay down a challenge to legal education orthodoxy and a call to arms for legal academic progressivists: that alternative dispute resolution (ADR) should be a compulsory, stand alone subject in the law degree. The authors put forward 10 simple arguments as to why every law student should be exposed to a semester-long course of ADR instruction.",
author = "James Duffy and Field, {Rachael M}",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "9--19",
journal = "Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal",
issn = "1441-7847",
publisher = "Lawbook Co.",
number = "1",

}

Why ADR must be a mandatory subject in the law degree : A cheat sheet for the willing and a primer for the non-believer. / Duffy, James; Field, Rachael M.

In: Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2014, p. 9-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why ADR must be a mandatory subject in the law degree

T2 - A cheat sheet for the willing and a primer for the non-believer

AU - Duffy, James

AU - Field, Rachael M

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The profession of law is deeply steeped in tradition and conservatism, which influences the content and pedagogy employed in law faculties across Australia. Indeed, the practice of law and the institutions of legal education are in a relationship of mutual influence; a dénouement which preserves the best aspects of the common law legal system, but also leaves the way we educate, practice and think about the role of law resistant to change. In this article, the authors lay down a challenge to legal education orthodoxy and a call to arms for legal academic progressivists: that alternative dispute resolution (ADR) should be a compulsory, stand alone subject in the law degree. The authors put forward 10 simple arguments as to why every law student should be exposed to a semester-long course of ADR instruction.

AB - The profession of law is deeply steeped in tradition and conservatism, which influences the content and pedagogy employed in law faculties across Australia. Indeed, the practice of law and the institutions of legal education are in a relationship of mutual influence; a dénouement which preserves the best aspects of the common law legal system, but also leaves the way we educate, practice and think about the role of law resistant to change. In this article, the authors lay down a challenge to legal education orthodoxy and a call to arms for legal academic progressivists: that alternative dispute resolution (ADR) should be a compulsory, stand alone subject in the law degree. The authors put forward 10 simple arguments as to why every law student should be exposed to a semester-long course of ADR instruction.

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 9

EP - 19

JO - Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal

JF - Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal

SN - 1441-7847

IS - 1

ER -