Who is the Other? Goethe’s Encounter with ‘China’ in his Concept of Weltliteratur

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

[Extract] In his influential book Orientalism (1978), Edward Said defined “Orientalism” as an attitude of superiority and hegemony on the part of the West vis à vis the East, an attitude derived from, and justified by, the historical process of colonization. Said demonstrated such Orientalism through a critical analysis of the writings of mainly British and French authors, but also applied the label to Goethe (Said 1978: 19), claiming that Goethe, even though belonging to a different historical context, nevertheless represented a specifically “German” version of Orientalism: “a kind of intellectual authority over the Orient within Western culture,” which was the common denominator with both Anglo-French and, later, American Orientalism.
Applied to Goethe, the father of the concept of Weltliteratur , this criticism – if valid – has significant consequences, and has provoked a correspondingly vigorous response. Most scholars have argued that Goethe engaged in conversations with “the Orient” throughout his lifetime, and achieved an imagined unification between the East and the West. This, it has been claimed, was based upon his own personal fascination for, and identification with, the East, particularly as reflected in his lyric poems in West-östlicher Divan ( West-Eastern Divan ). In the case of Goethe, the sense of superiority and distance to the Other so central to Orientalism as described by Said is, on such a view, simply not a factor (Bahr 1982; Birus 1991; Veit 2002; Einboden 2005).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMajor versus Minor? Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World
EditorsTheo D'haen, Iannis Goerlandt, Roger D. Sell
Place of PublicationAmsterdam
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Chapter16
Pages241-252
Number of pages12
Volume1
ISBN (Electronic)9789027268549
ISBN (Print)9789027201287
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameFILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Co.
ISSN (Print)2213-428X

Fingerprint

Orientalism
China
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
Superiority
Orient
Divan
Historical Context
Colonization
Unification
Critical Analysis
Hegemony
Western Culture
Lyrics
Edward Said
Poem
Authority
Criticism
Historical Process

Cite this

Chen, Y. (2015). Who is the Other? Goethe’s Encounter with ‘China’ in his Concept of Weltliteratur. In T. D'haen, I. Goerlandt, & R. D. Sell (Eds.), Major versus Minor? Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World (Vol. 1, pp. 241-252). (FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/fillm.1
Chen, Yi. / Who is the Other? Goethe’s Encounter with ‘China’ in his Concept of Weltliteratur. Major versus Minor? Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World. editor / Theo D'haen ; Iannis Goerlandt ; Roger D. Sell. Vol. 1 Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015. pp. 241-252 (FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures).
@inbook{af220ed04be64ea68ef241871a1b453d,
title = "Who is the Other? Goethe’s Encounter with ‘China’ in his Concept of Weltliteratur",
abstract = "[Extract] In his influential book Orientalism (1978), Edward Said defined “Orientalism” as an attitude of superiority and hegemony on the part of the West vis {\`a} vis the East, an attitude derived from, and justified by, the historical process of colonization. Said demonstrated such Orientalism through a critical analysis of the writings of mainly British and French authors, but also applied the label to Goethe (Said 1978: 19), claiming that Goethe, even though belonging to a different historical context, nevertheless represented a specifically “German” version of Orientalism: “a kind of intellectual authority over the Orient within Western culture,” which was the common denominator with both Anglo-French and, later, American Orientalism. Applied to Goethe, the father of the concept of Weltliteratur , this criticism – if valid – has significant consequences, and has provoked a correspondingly vigorous response. Most scholars have argued that Goethe engaged in conversations with “the Orient” throughout his lifetime, and achieved an imagined unification between the East and the West. This, it has been claimed, was based upon his own personal fascination for, and identification with, the East, particularly as reflected in his lyric poems in West-{\"o}stlicher Divan ( West-Eastern Divan ). In the case of Goethe, the sense of superiority and distance to the Other so central to Orientalism as described by Said is, on such a view, simply not a factor (Bahr 1982; Birus 1991; Veit 2002; Einboden 2005).",
author = "Yi Chen",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1075/fillm.1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789027201287",
volume = "1",
series = "FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
pages = "241--252",
editor = "Theo D'haen and Iannis Goerlandt and Sell, {Roger D.}",
booktitle = "Major versus Minor? Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Chen, Y 2015, Who is the Other? Goethe’s Encounter with ‘China’ in his Concept of Weltliteratur. in T D'haen, I Goerlandt & RD Sell (eds), Major versus Minor? Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World. vol. 1, FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1075/fillm.1

Who is the Other? Goethe’s Encounter with ‘China’ in his Concept of Weltliteratur. / Chen, Yi.

Major versus Minor? Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World. ed. / Theo D'haen; Iannis Goerlandt; Roger D. Sell. Vol. 1 Amsterdam : John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015. p. 241-252 (FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Who is the Other? Goethe’s Encounter with ‘China’ in his Concept of Weltliteratur

AU - Chen, Yi

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - [Extract] In his influential book Orientalism (1978), Edward Said defined “Orientalism” as an attitude of superiority and hegemony on the part of the West vis à vis the East, an attitude derived from, and justified by, the historical process of colonization. Said demonstrated such Orientalism through a critical analysis of the writings of mainly British and French authors, but also applied the label to Goethe (Said 1978: 19), claiming that Goethe, even though belonging to a different historical context, nevertheless represented a specifically “German” version of Orientalism: “a kind of intellectual authority over the Orient within Western culture,” which was the common denominator with both Anglo-French and, later, American Orientalism. Applied to Goethe, the father of the concept of Weltliteratur , this criticism – if valid – has significant consequences, and has provoked a correspondingly vigorous response. Most scholars have argued that Goethe engaged in conversations with “the Orient” throughout his lifetime, and achieved an imagined unification between the East and the West. This, it has been claimed, was based upon his own personal fascination for, and identification with, the East, particularly as reflected in his lyric poems in West-östlicher Divan ( West-Eastern Divan ). In the case of Goethe, the sense of superiority and distance to the Other so central to Orientalism as described by Said is, on such a view, simply not a factor (Bahr 1982; Birus 1991; Veit 2002; Einboden 2005).

AB - [Extract] In his influential book Orientalism (1978), Edward Said defined “Orientalism” as an attitude of superiority and hegemony on the part of the West vis à vis the East, an attitude derived from, and justified by, the historical process of colonization. Said demonstrated such Orientalism through a critical analysis of the writings of mainly British and French authors, but also applied the label to Goethe (Said 1978: 19), claiming that Goethe, even though belonging to a different historical context, nevertheless represented a specifically “German” version of Orientalism: “a kind of intellectual authority over the Orient within Western culture,” which was the common denominator with both Anglo-French and, later, American Orientalism. Applied to Goethe, the father of the concept of Weltliteratur , this criticism – if valid – has significant consequences, and has provoked a correspondingly vigorous response. Most scholars have argued that Goethe engaged in conversations with “the Orient” throughout his lifetime, and achieved an imagined unification between the East and the West. This, it has been claimed, was based upon his own personal fascination for, and identification with, the East, particularly as reflected in his lyric poems in West-östlicher Divan ( West-Eastern Divan ). In the case of Goethe, the sense of superiority and distance to the Other so central to Orientalism as described by Said is, on such a view, simply not a factor (Bahr 1982; Birus 1991; Veit 2002; Einboden 2005).

U2 - 10.1075/fillm.1

DO - 10.1075/fillm.1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789027201287

VL - 1

T3 - FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures

SP - 241

EP - 252

BT - Major versus Minor? Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World

A2 - D'haen, Theo

A2 - Goerlandt, Iannis

A2 - Sell, Roger D.

PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company

CY - Amsterdam

ER -

Chen Y. Who is the Other? Goethe’s Encounter with ‘China’ in his Concept of Weltliteratur. In D'haen T, Goerlandt I, Sell RD, editors, Major versus Minor? Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World. Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2015. p. 241-252. (FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures). https://doi.org/10.1075/fillm.1