Who coordinates infection control programs in Australia?

Cathryn L. Murphy, M. L. McLaws

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

not been previously profiled. Knowledge of their practice is limited, making support and evaluation of their programs difficult. To investigate the current role, function, and attributes of this group, we undertook a national survey of members of the Australian Infection Control Association. Methods: In 1996 a questionnaire was sent to all 1078 nonmedical and nonindustry members of the Australian Infection Control Association. More than half (65%) of the membership responded to the questionnaire, which measured demographics, experience, infection control training and education, staffing levels, perceived deficits, and managerial support. Results: Our results indicate that the typical Australian ICP works in a public acute-care facility with fewer than 251 beds, has 6 years experience in the field, and has completed hospital-based nursing training. Surveillance was the activity that consumed most of the ICPs' time. The majority of ICPs had responsibilities in addition to infection control, and although they considered management to be supportive, additional clerical support was identified as an area for program improvement. Conclusions: We have provided the first comprehensive profile of Australian ICPs and their practices. Our findings compel professional associations, such as the Australian Infection Control Association, to address the following: standardization in practice and surveillance, provision of appropriate training and ongoing education, and encouragement of research initiatives by infection control staff. These strategies are the key to future evidence-based infection control and will ensure survival of this specialty in Australia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-295
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Infection Control
Education
Program Evaluation
Nursing
Demography
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{6778205b4c9f4484b8c3dbe64c450995,
title = "Who coordinates infection control programs in Australia?",
abstract = "not been previously profiled. Knowledge of their practice is limited, making support and evaluation of their programs difficult. To investigate the current role, function, and attributes of this group, we undertook a national survey of members of the Australian Infection Control Association. Methods: In 1996 a questionnaire was sent to all 1078 nonmedical and nonindustry members of the Australian Infection Control Association. More than half (65{\%}) of the membership responded to the questionnaire, which measured demographics, experience, infection control training and education, staffing levels, perceived deficits, and managerial support. Results: Our results indicate that the typical Australian ICP works in a public acute-care facility with fewer than 251 beds, has 6 years experience in the field, and has completed hospital-based nursing training. Surveillance was the activity that consumed most of the ICPs' time. The majority of ICPs had responsibilities in addition to infection control, and although they considered management to be supportive, additional clerical support was identified as an area for program improvement. Conclusions: We have provided the first comprehensive profile of Australian ICPs and their practices. Our findings compel professional associations, such as the Australian Infection Control Association, to address the following: standardization in practice and surveillance, provision of appropriate training and ongoing education, and encouragement of research initiatives by infection control staff. These strategies are the key to future evidence-based infection control and will ensure survival of this specialty in Australia.",
author = "Murphy, {Cathryn L.} and McLaws, {M. L.}",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/ic.1999.v27.a92961",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "291--295",
journal = "American Journal of Infection Control",
issn = "0161-6005",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Who coordinates infection control programs in Australia? / Murphy, Cathryn L.; McLaws, M. L.

In: American Journal of Infection Control, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.01.1999, p. 291-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who coordinates infection control programs in Australia?

AU - Murphy, Cathryn L.

AU - McLaws, M. L.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - not been previously profiled. Knowledge of their practice is limited, making support and evaluation of their programs difficult. To investigate the current role, function, and attributes of this group, we undertook a national survey of members of the Australian Infection Control Association. Methods: In 1996 a questionnaire was sent to all 1078 nonmedical and nonindustry members of the Australian Infection Control Association. More than half (65%) of the membership responded to the questionnaire, which measured demographics, experience, infection control training and education, staffing levels, perceived deficits, and managerial support. Results: Our results indicate that the typical Australian ICP works in a public acute-care facility with fewer than 251 beds, has 6 years experience in the field, and has completed hospital-based nursing training. Surveillance was the activity that consumed most of the ICPs' time. The majority of ICPs had responsibilities in addition to infection control, and although they considered management to be supportive, additional clerical support was identified as an area for program improvement. Conclusions: We have provided the first comprehensive profile of Australian ICPs and their practices. Our findings compel professional associations, such as the Australian Infection Control Association, to address the following: standardization in practice and surveillance, provision of appropriate training and ongoing education, and encouragement of research initiatives by infection control staff. These strategies are the key to future evidence-based infection control and will ensure survival of this specialty in Australia.

AB - not been previously profiled. Knowledge of their practice is limited, making support and evaluation of their programs difficult. To investigate the current role, function, and attributes of this group, we undertook a national survey of members of the Australian Infection Control Association. Methods: In 1996 a questionnaire was sent to all 1078 nonmedical and nonindustry members of the Australian Infection Control Association. More than half (65%) of the membership responded to the questionnaire, which measured demographics, experience, infection control training and education, staffing levels, perceived deficits, and managerial support. Results: Our results indicate that the typical Australian ICP works in a public acute-care facility with fewer than 251 beds, has 6 years experience in the field, and has completed hospital-based nursing training. Surveillance was the activity that consumed most of the ICPs' time. The majority of ICPs had responsibilities in addition to infection control, and although they considered management to be supportive, additional clerical support was identified as an area for program improvement. Conclusions: We have provided the first comprehensive profile of Australian ICPs and their practices. Our findings compel professional associations, such as the Australian Infection Control Association, to address the following: standardization in practice and surveillance, provision of appropriate training and ongoing education, and encouragement of research initiatives by infection control staff. These strategies are the key to future evidence-based infection control and will ensure survival of this specialty in Australia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033067743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/ic.1999.v27.a92961

DO - 10.1053/ic.1999.v27.a92961

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 291

EP - 295

JO - American Journal of Infection Control

JF - American Journal of Infection Control

SN - 0161-6005

IS - 3

ER -