When secret use is not so secret

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The concept of secret use has been a difficult element in establishing whether the validity of a patent may be challenged. Its difficulty is entrenched in the uncertainty of interpretation of the construction of the legislation and the meaning that the legislature imparts on it. One of the main cases in Australian patent law that has tested the issue of secret use is Azuko Pty Ltd. v. Old Digger Pty Ltd. (2001) 52 IPR 75. The significance of this decision is the differing approaches to the issue of secret use. This case demonstrates the various practical and policy implications that arise out of the differing views from the judgment. This paper will discuss the practical and policy implications raised by the differing views of the judges.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-188
Number of pages24
JournalInformation and Communications Technology Law
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

patent law
patent
legislation
uncertainty
interpretation
Uncertainty

Cite this

@article{d9a38c6441334301866f19e49b43d786,
title = "When secret use is not so secret",
abstract = "The concept of secret use has been a difficult element in establishing whether the validity of a patent may be challenged. Its difficulty is entrenched in the uncertainty of interpretation of the construction of the legislation and the meaning that the legislature imparts on it. One of the main cases in Australian patent law that has tested the issue of secret use is Azuko Pty Ltd. v. Old Digger Pty Ltd. (2001) 52 IPR 75. The significance of this decision is the differing approaches to the issue of secret use. This case demonstrates the various practical and policy implications that arise out of the differing views from the judgment. This paper will discuss the practical and policy implications raised by the differing views of the judges.",
author = "Eugenia Georgiades",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/13600834.2010.494054",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "165--188",
journal = "Information and Communications Technology Law",
issn = "1360-0834",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

When secret use is not so secret. / Georgiades, Eugenia.

In: Information and Communications Technology Law, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2010, p. 165-188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - When secret use is not so secret

AU - Georgiades, Eugenia

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The concept of secret use has been a difficult element in establishing whether the validity of a patent may be challenged. Its difficulty is entrenched in the uncertainty of interpretation of the construction of the legislation and the meaning that the legislature imparts on it. One of the main cases in Australian patent law that has tested the issue of secret use is Azuko Pty Ltd. v. Old Digger Pty Ltd. (2001) 52 IPR 75. The significance of this decision is the differing approaches to the issue of secret use. This case demonstrates the various practical and policy implications that arise out of the differing views from the judgment. This paper will discuss the practical and policy implications raised by the differing views of the judges.

AB - The concept of secret use has been a difficult element in establishing whether the validity of a patent may be challenged. Its difficulty is entrenched in the uncertainty of interpretation of the construction of the legislation and the meaning that the legislature imparts on it. One of the main cases in Australian patent law that has tested the issue of secret use is Azuko Pty Ltd. v. Old Digger Pty Ltd. (2001) 52 IPR 75. The significance of this decision is the differing approaches to the issue of secret use. This case demonstrates the various practical and policy implications that arise out of the differing views from the judgment. This paper will discuss the practical and policy implications raised by the differing views of the judges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955958643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13600834.2010.494054

DO - 10.1080/13600834.2010.494054

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 165

EP - 188

JO - Information and Communications Technology Law

JF - Information and Communications Technology Law

SN - 1360-0834

IS - 2

ER -