When Criminal Laws affects Business Enterprises: A Case Study of the Tattoo Parlours Act in Queensland, Australia

RA Lincoln, Lucy Gubbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Several Australian states have embarked on legislative reform aimed at curbing motorcycle club members’ involvement in criminal activities. These reforms extended into the sphere of legitimate business enterprises with the creation or amendment of occupational licensing regulations. This article examines one such example — the Tattoo Parlours Act 2013 in Queensland — with a particular focus on its use of criminal intelligence evidence, its non-disclosure provisions, and how these impact on fairness, equality, and the right to conduct business. This review sets out the background to the Act, explains the processes of application and appeal, and critiques the consequences of such licensing laws. The paper canvasses three main issues: that these laws constitute “hyperlegislation” that is characterised by political expediency, haste, and poor drafting; that the criminal law, especially that which deals with associations, can impact on legitimate enterprise; and that such laws lead to the stigmatisation of individuals giving few avenues for legal recourse. With this tranche of laws having been recently reviewed and revised, it is anticipated that many of these criticisms have been addressed. However, it is doubtful that all problematic aspects of the laws will be reversed, and it is unclear what opportunities for redress will be open to those individuals and businesses who were subjected to the laws in their previous form.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-41
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Business and Social Science
Volume9
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

Fingerprint

tattoo
business enterprise
criminal law
act
Law
club member
reform
motorcycle
stigmatization
recourse
fairness
amendment
equality
appeal
intelligence
criticism
regulation
evidence

Cite this

@article{320ba11768e844bdab7650e2ad46e025,
title = "When Criminal Laws affects Business Enterprises: A Case Study of the Tattoo Parlours Act in Queensland, Australia",
abstract = "Several Australian states have embarked on legislative reform aimed at curbing motorcycle club members’ involvement in criminal activities. These reforms extended into the sphere of legitimate business enterprises with the creation or amendment of occupational licensing regulations. This article examines one such example — the Tattoo Parlours Act 2013 in Queensland — with a particular focus on its use of criminal intelligence evidence, its non-disclosure provisions, and how these impact on fairness, equality, and the right to conduct business. This review sets out the background to the Act, explains the processes of application and appeal, and critiques the consequences of such licensing laws. The paper canvasses three main issues: that these laws constitute “hyperlegislation” that is characterised by political expediency, haste, and poor drafting; that the criminal law, especially that which deals with associations, can impact on legitimate enterprise; and that such laws lead to the stigmatisation of individuals giving few avenues for legal recourse. With this tranche of laws having been recently reviewed and revised, it is anticipated that many of these criticisms have been addressed. However, it is doubtful that all problematic aspects of the laws will be reversed, and it is unclear what opportunities for redress will be open to those individuals and businesses who were subjected to the laws in their previous form.",
author = "RA Lincoln and Lucy Gubbins",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
doi = "10.30845/ijbss.v9n7p5",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "35--41",
journal = "International Journal of Business and Social Science",
issn = "2219-6021",
number = "7",

}

When Criminal Laws affects Business Enterprises: A Case Study of the Tattoo Parlours Act in Queensland, Australia. / Lincoln, RA; Gubbins, Lucy.

In: International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 9, No. 7, 07.2018, p. 35-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - When Criminal Laws affects Business Enterprises: A Case Study of the Tattoo Parlours Act in Queensland, Australia

AU - Lincoln, RA

AU - Gubbins, Lucy

PY - 2018/7

Y1 - 2018/7

N2 - Several Australian states have embarked on legislative reform aimed at curbing motorcycle club members’ involvement in criminal activities. These reforms extended into the sphere of legitimate business enterprises with the creation or amendment of occupational licensing regulations. This article examines one such example — the Tattoo Parlours Act 2013 in Queensland — with a particular focus on its use of criminal intelligence evidence, its non-disclosure provisions, and how these impact on fairness, equality, and the right to conduct business. This review sets out the background to the Act, explains the processes of application and appeal, and critiques the consequences of such licensing laws. The paper canvasses three main issues: that these laws constitute “hyperlegislation” that is characterised by political expediency, haste, and poor drafting; that the criminal law, especially that which deals with associations, can impact on legitimate enterprise; and that such laws lead to the stigmatisation of individuals giving few avenues for legal recourse. With this tranche of laws having been recently reviewed and revised, it is anticipated that many of these criticisms have been addressed. However, it is doubtful that all problematic aspects of the laws will be reversed, and it is unclear what opportunities for redress will be open to those individuals and businesses who were subjected to the laws in their previous form.

AB - Several Australian states have embarked on legislative reform aimed at curbing motorcycle club members’ involvement in criminal activities. These reforms extended into the sphere of legitimate business enterprises with the creation or amendment of occupational licensing regulations. This article examines one such example — the Tattoo Parlours Act 2013 in Queensland — with a particular focus on its use of criminal intelligence evidence, its non-disclosure provisions, and how these impact on fairness, equality, and the right to conduct business. This review sets out the background to the Act, explains the processes of application and appeal, and critiques the consequences of such licensing laws. The paper canvasses three main issues: that these laws constitute “hyperlegislation” that is characterised by political expediency, haste, and poor drafting; that the criminal law, especially that which deals with associations, can impact on legitimate enterprise; and that such laws lead to the stigmatisation of individuals giving few avenues for legal recourse. With this tranche of laws having been recently reviewed and revised, it is anticipated that many of these criticisms have been addressed. However, it is doubtful that all problematic aspects of the laws will be reversed, and it is unclear what opportunities for redress will be open to those individuals and businesses who were subjected to the laws in their previous form.

U2 - 10.30845/ijbss.v9n7p5

DO - 10.30845/ijbss.v9n7p5

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 35

EP - 41

JO - International Journal of Business and Social Science

JF - International Journal of Business and Social Science

SN - 2219-6021

IS - 7

ER -