What strategies do us hospitals employ to reduce unwarranted clinical practice variations?

Robin Gauld*, Jedediah Horwitt, Sheila Williams, Alan B. Cohen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Little is known about unwarranted clinical practice variations within US hospitals. The objectives of this study were to investigate whether hospitals are concerned about variations and their experiences with strategies to reduce variations. Case studies were conducted at 5 hospitals, and a survey of acute care hospitals was conducted in 4 states. Each of the case studies presented a different experience. Unwarranted variations were a concern for 90% of survey respondents, with no differences by state (P =.7) or hospital size (P =.2). Of these, 75% had a strategy in place to reduce variation. The likelihood of a multipronged approach was significantly higher in larger hospitals (P =.0009). This study revealed disparate approaches to reducing unwarranted clinical practice variations and also highlighted barriers to reducing variation. The case studies identified some models that could be emulated, but questions remain about whether there is a single best way forward.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-126
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Cite this