What is the feasibility and observed effect of two implementation packages for stroke rehabilitation therapists implementing upper limb guidelines? A cluster controlled feasibility study

Laura Jolliffe, Tammy Hoffmann, Leonid Churilov, Natasha A Lannin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hand and arm activity after stroke improves with evidence-based rehabilitation. Therapists face known barriers when providing evidence-based rehabilitation and require support to implement guidelines. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of two implementation packages on guideline adherence by occupational therapists and physiotherapists, and explore effect on patient upper limb outcomes.

METHOD: This was a non-randomised clustered feasibility study of occupational and physiotherapy rehabilitation services (n=3 inpatient and n=3 outpatient services). Services were allocated to one of three groups: (group A) facilitator-mediated implementation package, (group B) self-directed implementation package or (group C) usual care (control); we recruited n=1 inpatient and n=1 outpatient service per group. Outcomes of feasibility, adherence to guidelines (medical file audits) and patient upper limb impairment (Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment), activity (Box and Block Test) and practice (minutes/week) were collected at baseline and after 3 months of intervention.

RESULTS: 29 therapists (8 in group A, 13 in groups B and 8 in group C) and 55 patients participated. Both the facilitator-mediated and the self-directed implementation packages were feasible to deliver in the rehabilitation setting. Therapists in group A improved with respect to guideline adherence (medical file audits; median within-group proportion difference of 0.29 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.36, p<0.0001) preintervention to postintervention). No significant within-group differences from baseline to postintervention were found in group B or group C, and no between-group differences were found for upper limb outcomes.

CONCLUSION: A facilitator-mediated package was acceptable to therapists working in stroke rehabilitation, and feasibility data suggest increased guideline uptake following implementation. An adequately powered study is planned to understand how to support therapists to provide evidence-based upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000596101).

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere000954
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Open Quality
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What is the feasibility and observed effect of two implementation packages for stroke rehabilitation therapists implementing upper limb guidelines? A cluster controlled feasibility study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this