What is lawyering? The challenge of taxonomy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OVER the past few years, an important legal debate has been raging, the full effects of which many lawyers have not yet felt. I am referring to the taxonomy debate and, specifically, the attempts by the late Professor Peter Birks and (the mainly academic) supporters and advocates of his and similar views to impose a coherent and logical taxonomy upon private (common) law. Much more attention should be paid to sound taxonomy, it is argued. This “great project” has been little noticed outside the backwater of the law in which it began, namely the law of restitution (or “unjust enrichment” as the theorists here under consideration would prefer).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)549-578
Number of pages30
JournalCambridge Law Journal
Volume65
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

taxonomy
private law
Law
common law
lawyer
university teacher

Cite this

@article{569f740bcd894a39befe58c3ec4df083,
title = "What is lawyering? The challenge of taxonomy",
abstract = "OVER the past few years, an important legal debate has been raging, the full effects of which many lawyers have not yet felt. I am referring to the taxonomy debate and, specifically, the attempts by the late Professor Peter Birks and (the mainly academic) supporters and advocates of his and similar views to impose a coherent and logical taxonomy upon private (common) law. Much more attention should be paid to sound taxonomy, it is argued. This “great project” has been little noticed outside the backwater of the law in which it began, namely the law of restitution (or “unjust enrichment” as the theorists here under consideration would prefer).",
author = "Joachim Dietrich",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1017/S0008197306007227",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "549--578",
journal = "Cambridge Law Journal",
issn = "0008-1973",
publisher = "Stevens & Sons",
number = "3",

}

What is lawyering? The challenge of taxonomy. / Dietrich, Joachim.

In: Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 65, No. 3, 2006, p. 549-578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is lawyering? The challenge of taxonomy

AU - Dietrich, Joachim

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - OVER the past few years, an important legal debate has been raging, the full effects of which many lawyers have not yet felt. I am referring to the taxonomy debate and, specifically, the attempts by the late Professor Peter Birks and (the mainly academic) supporters and advocates of his and similar views to impose a coherent and logical taxonomy upon private (common) law. Much more attention should be paid to sound taxonomy, it is argued. This “great project” has been little noticed outside the backwater of the law in which it began, namely the law of restitution (or “unjust enrichment” as the theorists here under consideration would prefer).

AB - OVER the past few years, an important legal debate has been raging, the full effects of which many lawyers have not yet felt. I am referring to the taxonomy debate and, specifically, the attempts by the late Professor Peter Birks and (the mainly academic) supporters and advocates of his and similar views to impose a coherent and logical taxonomy upon private (common) law. Much more attention should be paid to sound taxonomy, it is argued. This “great project” has been little noticed outside the backwater of the law in which it began, namely the law of restitution (or “unjust enrichment” as the theorists here under consideration would prefer).

U2 - 10.1017/S0008197306007227

DO - 10.1017/S0008197306007227

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 549

EP - 578

JO - Cambridge Law Journal

JF - Cambridge Law Journal

SN - 0008-1973

IS - 3

ER -