What is inappropriate hospital use for elderly people near the end of life? A systematic review

Magnolia Cardona-Morrell, James C.H. Kim, Mikkel Brabrand, Blanca Gallego-Luxan, Ken Hillman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Older people with advance chronic illness use hospital services repeatedly near the end of life. Some of these hospitalizations are considered inappropriate. Aim To investigate extent and causes of inappropriate hospital admission among older patients near the end of life. Methods English language publications in Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and the grey literature (January 1995–December 2016) covering community and nursing home residents aged ≥ 60 years admitted to hospital. Outcomes: measurements of inappropriateness. A 17-item quality score was estimated independently by two authors. Results The definition of ‘Inappropriate admissions’ near the end of life incorporated system factors, social and family factors. The prevalence of inappropriate admissions ranged widely depending largely on non-clinical reasons: poor availability of alternative sites of care or failure of preventive actions by other healthcare providers (1.7–67.0%); family requests (up to 10.5%); or too late an admission to be of benefit (1.7–35.0%). The widespread use of subjective parameters not routinely collected in practice, and the inclusion of non-clinical factors precluded the true estimation of clinical inappropriateness. Conclusions Clinical inappropriateness and system factors that preclude alternative community care must be measured separately. They are two very different justifications for hospital admissions, requiring different solutions. Society has a duty to ensure availability of community alternatives for the management of ambulatory-sensitive conditions and facilitate skilling of staff to manage the terminally ill in non-acute settings. Only then would the evaluation of local variations in clinically inappropriate admissions and inappropriate length of stay be possible to undertake.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-50
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Homes for the Aged
Literature
Terminally Ill
Nursing Homes
PubMed
Health Personnel
Libraries
Publications
Length of Stay
Hospitalization
Chronic Disease
Language

Cite this

Cardona-Morrell, Magnolia ; Kim, James C.H. ; Brabrand, Mikkel ; Gallego-Luxan, Blanca ; Hillman, Ken. / What is inappropriate hospital use for elderly people near the end of life? A systematic review. In: European Journal of Internal Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 42. pp. 39-50.
@article{ae4ea6220119429bba08940b924a6238,
title = "What is inappropriate hospital use for elderly people near the end of life? A systematic review",
abstract = "Background Older people with advance chronic illness use hospital services repeatedly near the end of life. Some of these hospitalizations are considered inappropriate. Aim To investigate extent and causes of inappropriate hospital admission among older patients near the end of life. Methods English language publications in Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and the grey literature (January 1995–December 2016) covering community and nursing home residents aged ≥ 60 years admitted to hospital. Outcomes: measurements of inappropriateness. A 17-item quality score was estimated independently by two authors. Results The definition of ‘Inappropriate admissions’ near the end of life incorporated system factors, social and family factors. The prevalence of inappropriate admissions ranged widely depending largely on non-clinical reasons: poor availability of alternative sites of care or failure of preventive actions by other healthcare providers (1.7–67.0{\%}); family requests (up to 10.5{\%}); or too late an admission to be of benefit (1.7–35.0{\%}). The widespread use of subjective parameters not routinely collected in practice, and the inclusion of non-clinical factors precluded the true estimation of clinical inappropriateness. Conclusions Clinical inappropriateness and system factors that preclude alternative community care must be measured separately. They are two very different justifications for hospital admissions, requiring different solutions. Society has a duty to ensure availability of community alternatives for the management of ambulatory-sensitive conditions and facilitate skilling of staff to manage the terminally ill in non-acute settings. Only then would the evaluation of local variations in clinically inappropriate admissions and inappropriate length of stay be possible to undertake.",
author = "Magnolia Cardona-Morrell and Kim, {James C.H.} and Mikkel Brabrand and Blanca Gallego-Luxan and Ken Hillman",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejim.2017.04.014",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "39--50",
journal = "European Journal of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0953-6205",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

What is inappropriate hospital use for elderly people near the end of life? A systematic review. / Cardona-Morrell, Magnolia; Kim, James C.H.; Brabrand, Mikkel; Gallego-Luxan, Blanca; Hillman, Ken.

In: European Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 42, 01.07.2017, p. 39-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is inappropriate hospital use for elderly people near the end of life? A systematic review

AU - Cardona-Morrell, Magnolia

AU - Kim, James C.H.

AU - Brabrand, Mikkel

AU - Gallego-Luxan, Blanca

AU - Hillman, Ken

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Background Older people with advance chronic illness use hospital services repeatedly near the end of life. Some of these hospitalizations are considered inappropriate. Aim To investigate extent and causes of inappropriate hospital admission among older patients near the end of life. Methods English language publications in Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and the grey literature (January 1995–December 2016) covering community and nursing home residents aged ≥ 60 years admitted to hospital. Outcomes: measurements of inappropriateness. A 17-item quality score was estimated independently by two authors. Results The definition of ‘Inappropriate admissions’ near the end of life incorporated system factors, social and family factors. The prevalence of inappropriate admissions ranged widely depending largely on non-clinical reasons: poor availability of alternative sites of care or failure of preventive actions by other healthcare providers (1.7–67.0%); family requests (up to 10.5%); or too late an admission to be of benefit (1.7–35.0%). The widespread use of subjective parameters not routinely collected in practice, and the inclusion of non-clinical factors precluded the true estimation of clinical inappropriateness. Conclusions Clinical inappropriateness and system factors that preclude alternative community care must be measured separately. They are two very different justifications for hospital admissions, requiring different solutions. Society has a duty to ensure availability of community alternatives for the management of ambulatory-sensitive conditions and facilitate skilling of staff to manage the terminally ill in non-acute settings. Only then would the evaluation of local variations in clinically inappropriate admissions and inappropriate length of stay be possible to undertake.

AB - Background Older people with advance chronic illness use hospital services repeatedly near the end of life. Some of these hospitalizations are considered inappropriate. Aim To investigate extent and causes of inappropriate hospital admission among older patients near the end of life. Methods English language publications in Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library, and the grey literature (January 1995–December 2016) covering community and nursing home residents aged ≥ 60 years admitted to hospital. Outcomes: measurements of inappropriateness. A 17-item quality score was estimated independently by two authors. Results The definition of ‘Inappropriate admissions’ near the end of life incorporated system factors, social and family factors. The prevalence of inappropriate admissions ranged widely depending largely on non-clinical reasons: poor availability of alternative sites of care or failure of preventive actions by other healthcare providers (1.7–67.0%); family requests (up to 10.5%); or too late an admission to be of benefit (1.7–35.0%). The widespread use of subjective parameters not routinely collected in practice, and the inclusion of non-clinical factors precluded the true estimation of clinical inappropriateness. Conclusions Clinical inappropriateness and system factors that preclude alternative community care must be measured separately. They are two very different justifications for hospital admissions, requiring different solutions. Society has a duty to ensure availability of community alternatives for the management of ambulatory-sensitive conditions and facilitate skilling of staff to manage the terminally ill in non-acute settings. Only then would the evaluation of local variations in clinically inappropriate admissions and inappropriate length of stay be possible to undertake.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019135587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.04.014

M3 - Review article

VL - 42

SP - 39

EP - 50

JO - European Journal of Internal Medicine

JF - European Journal of Internal Medicine

SN - 0953-6205

ER -