Abstract
When reading an article, we often wonder whether the study was large enough. If a study does not find a statistically significant effect (e.g., at P < 0.05), it may be because the study was too small or because there actually is no true effect. You should check whether the CIs show that the data are consistent with a clinically important effect, even though the effect was not “statistically significant.”
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | A8-9 |
| Journal | ACP Journal Club |
| Volume | 147 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Was the study big enough? Two "café" rules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Related Research Outputs
- 2 Citations
- 1 Comment/debate/opinion
-
Was the study big enough? Two café rules
Glasziou, P. & Doll, H., Jun 2006, In: Evidence-Based Medicine. 11, 3, p. 69-70 2 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate/opinion › Research › peer-review
8 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver