Abstract
This article discusses the aspect of recent voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws dealing with a health care provider who declines to provide VAD services. While the law permits the provider to do so, it is sometimes less clear what, if anything, they must do to facilitate VAD service provision by others. Legislation in three jurisdictions is silent on the matter. This article considers refusals to facilitate VAD services, in light of human rights provisions, particularly anti-discrimination legislation, and the guidance available internationally. Existing VAD literature does not consider discrimination arguments in relation to refusal to participate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1128-1149 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of law and medicine |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2022 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Voluntary Assisted Dying, the Conscientious Objector Who Refuses to Facilitate It and Discrimination Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver