Vital signs monitoring on general wards: Clinical staff perceptions of current practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring technology

Mirela Prgomet, Magnolia Cardona-Morrell, Margaret Nicholson, Rebecca Lake, Janet Long, Johanna Westbrook, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Ken Hillman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Early detection of patient deterioration and prevention of adverse events are key challenges to patient safety. This study investigated clinical staff perceptions of current monitoring practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring devices on general wards.Design: Multi-method study comprising structured surveys, in-depth interviews and device trial with log book feedback.Setting: Two general wards in a large urban teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia.Participants: Respiratory and neurosurgery nursing staff and two doctors.Results: Nurses were confident about their abilities to identify patients at risk of deterioration, using a combination of vital signs and visual assessment. There were concerns about the accuracy of current vital signs monitoring equipment and frequency of intermittent observation. Both the nurses and the doctors were enthusiastic about the prospect of continuous monitoring and perceived it would allow earlier identification of patient deterioration; provide reassurance to patients; and support interdisciplinary communication. There were also reservations about continuous monitoring, including potential decrease in bedside nurse-patient interactions; increase in inappropriate escalations of patient care; and discomfort to patients.Conclusions: While continuous monitoring devices were seen as a potentially positive tool to support the identification of patient deterioration, drawbacks, such as the potential for reduced patient contact, revealed key areas that will require close surveillance following the implementation of devices. Training and improved interdisciplinary communication were identified as key requisites for successful implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)515-521
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patients' Rooms
Vital Signs
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Interdisciplinary Communication
Nurses
Aptitude
Nursing Staff
Urban Hospitals
Neurosurgery
Patient Safety
Teaching Hospitals
Patient Care
Observation
Interviews

Cite this

Prgomet, Mirela ; Cardona-Morrell, Magnolia ; Nicholson, Margaret ; Lake, Rebecca ; Long, Janet ; Westbrook, Johanna ; Braithwaite, Jeffrey ; Hillman, Ken. / Vital signs monitoring on general wards : Clinical staff perceptions of current practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring technology. In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2016 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 515-521.
@article{54f86ea5cde4498781abcbc260277fa5,
title = "Vital signs monitoring on general wards: Clinical staff perceptions of current practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring technology",
abstract = "Objective: Early detection of patient deterioration and prevention of adverse events are key challenges to patient safety. This study investigated clinical staff perceptions of current monitoring practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring devices on general wards.Design: Multi-method study comprising structured surveys, in-depth interviews and device trial with log book feedback.Setting: Two general wards in a large urban teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia.Participants: Respiratory and neurosurgery nursing staff and two doctors.Results: Nurses were confident about their abilities to identify patients at risk of deterioration, using a combination of vital signs and visual assessment. There were concerns about the accuracy of current vital signs monitoring equipment and frequency of intermittent observation. Both the nurses and the doctors were enthusiastic about the prospect of continuous monitoring and perceived it would allow earlier identification of patient deterioration; provide reassurance to patients; and support interdisciplinary communication. There were also reservations about continuous monitoring, including potential decrease in bedside nurse-patient interactions; increase in inappropriate escalations of patient care; and discomfort to patients.Conclusions: While continuous monitoring devices were seen as a potentially positive tool to support the identification of patient deterioration, drawbacks, such as the potential for reduced patient contact, revealed key areas that will require close surveillance following the implementation of devices. Training and improved interdisciplinary communication were identified as key requisites for successful implementation.",
author = "Mirela Prgomet and Magnolia Cardona-Morrell and Margaret Nicholson and Rebecca Lake and Janet Long and Johanna Westbrook and Jeffrey Braithwaite and Ken Hillman",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzw062",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "515--521",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Vital signs monitoring on general wards : Clinical staff perceptions of current practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring technology. / Prgomet, Mirela; Cardona-Morrell, Magnolia; Nicholson, Margaret; Lake, Rebecca; Long, Janet; Westbrook, Johanna; Braithwaite, Jeffrey; Hillman, Ken.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.09.2016, p. 515-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vital signs monitoring on general wards

T2 - Clinical staff perceptions of current practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring technology

AU - Prgomet, Mirela

AU - Cardona-Morrell, Magnolia

AU - Nicholson, Margaret

AU - Lake, Rebecca

AU - Long, Janet

AU - Westbrook, Johanna

AU - Braithwaite, Jeffrey

AU - Hillman, Ken

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Objective: Early detection of patient deterioration and prevention of adverse events are key challenges to patient safety. This study investigated clinical staff perceptions of current monitoring practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring devices on general wards.Design: Multi-method study comprising structured surveys, in-depth interviews and device trial with log book feedback.Setting: Two general wards in a large urban teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia.Participants: Respiratory and neurosurgery nursing staff and two doctors.Results: Nurses were confident about their abilities to identify patients at risk of deterioration, using a combination of vital signs and visual assessment. There were concerns about the accuracy of current vital signs monitoring equipment and frequency of intermittent observation. Both the nurses and the doctors were enthusiastic about the prospect of continuous monitoring and perceived it would allow earlier identification of patient deterioration; provide reassurance to patients; and support interdisciplinary communication. There were also reservations about continuous monitoring, including potential decrease in bedside nurse-patient interactions; increase in inappropriate escalations of patient care; and discomfort to patients.Conclusions: While continuous monitoring devices were seen as a potentially positive tool to support the identification of patient deterioration, drawbacks, such as the potential for reduced patient contact, revealed key areas that will require close surveillance following the implementation of devices. Training and improved interdisciplinary communication were identified as key requisites for successful implementation.

AB - Objective: Early detection of patient deterioration and prevention of adverse events are key challenges to patient safety. This study investigated clinical staff perceptions of current monitoring practices and the planned introduction of continuous monitoring devices on general wards.Design: Multi-method study comprising structured surveys, in-depth interviews and device trial with log book feedback.Setting: Two general wards in a large urban teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia.Participants: Respiratory and neurosurgery nursing staff and two doctors.Results: Nurses were confident about their abilities to identify patients at risk of deterioration, using a combination of vital signs and visual assessment. There were concerns about the accuracy of current vital signs monitoring equipment and frequency of intermittent observation. Both the nurses and the doctors were enthusiastic about the prospect of continuous monitoring and perceived it would allow earlier identification of patient deterioration; provide reassurance to patients; and support interdisciplinary communication. There were also reservations about continuous monitoring, including potential decrease in bedside nurse-patient interactions; increase in inappropriate escalations of patient care; and discomfort to patients.Conclusions: While continuous monitoring devices were seen as a potentially positive tool to support the identification of patient deterioration, drawbacks, such as the potential for reduced patient contact, revealed key areas that will require close surveillance following the implementation of devices. Training and improved interdisciplinary communication were identified as key requisites for successful implementation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991812968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzw062

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzw062

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 515

EP - 521

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 4

ER -