Victim Precipitation: An Outdated Construct or an Important Forensic Consideration?

Wayne Petherick, Arathi Kannan, Nathan Brooks*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Risk assessment and threat management are important components of crime control and crime prevention, with the results of assessments having a significant impact on personal and community safety. There may also be important legal implications arising from these if individuals are deemed to be a risk to others. There is evidence showing that traditional risk assessment tools do not consider the victim's role, even though it is important to incorporate into assessment and management to gain a full understanding of the risk and the intervention to decrease or eliminate risk or harm. This paper reviews the construct of victim precipitation, where the victim may actively do something or has characteristics that entice or incite an offender. Victim precipitation is a controversial topic that has not been the subject of much recent research, and its relationship to risk assessment and threat management has therefore been largely ignored. This paper argues that excluding victim precipitation has a negative impact on the conclusions derived from risk assessment and threat management. This is done by analyzing victim precipitation, risk assessment, and threat management in detail which helps understand the role precipitation plays.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-229
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
Volume21
Issue number3
Early online date29 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Cite this