Variations in the offence actions of deliberate firesetters: A cross-national analysis

Katarina Fritzon, Rebekah Doley, Kerrilee Hollows

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since Canter and Fritzon first introduced their "4D" classification system for arson, many studies have replicated the model with samples of arsonists from around the world. However, scholars have reported differences in the offence actions of arsonists across samples. No study as yet has attempted to statically examine the relevance of these differences. Using multidimensional scaling procedures and two-way chi-square contingency analyses, this study examined whether cross-national differences in arson variables existed between Australian and British arsonists. The results indicated that differences did exist and, furthermore, that differences reflected the environmental characteristics of the country from which each sample was drawn. These findings have important theoretical and clinical implications, particularly for the utility of the "4D" model as an investigatory tool and for the wider arson profiling literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1150-1165
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Volume58
Issue number10
Early online date29 May 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Firesetting Behavior
Offence
Arson

Cite this

@article{8332cd2c65ba404d8e875a8831a117d4,
title = "Variations in the offence actions of deliberate firesetters: A cross-national analysis",
abstract = "Since Canter and Fritzon first introduced their {"}4D{"} classification system for arson, many studies have replicated the model with samples of arsonists from around the world. However, scholars have reported differences in the offence actions of arsonists across samples. No study as yet has attempted to statically examine the relevance of these differences. Using multidimensional scaling procedures and two-way chi-square contingency analyses, this study examined whether cross-national differences in arson variables existed between Australian and British arsonists. The results indicated that differences did exist and, furthermore, that differences reflected the environmental characteristics of the country from which each sample was drawn. These findings have important theoretical and clinical implications, particularly for the utility of the {"}4D{"} model as an investigatory tool and for the wider arson profiling literature.",
author = "Katarina Fritzon and Rebekah Doley and Kerrilee Hollows",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/0306624X13487524",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "1150--1165",
journal = "International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology",
issn = "0306-624X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "10",

}

Variations in the offence actions of deliberate firesetters : A cross-national analysis. / Fritzon, Katarina; Doley, Rebekah; Hollows, Kerrilee.

In: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Vol. 58, No. 10, 2014, p. 1150-1165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variations in the offence actions of deliberate firesetters

T2 - A cross-national analysis

AU - Fritzon, Katarina

AU - Doley, Rebekah

AU - Hollows, Kerrilee

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Since Canter and Fritzon first introduced their "4D" classification system for arson, many studies have replicated the model with samples of arsonists from around the world. However, scholars have reported differences in the offence actions of arsonists across samples. No study as yet has attempted to statically examine the relevance of these differences. Using multidimensional scaling procedures and two-way chi-square contingency analyses, this study examined whether cross-national differences in arson variables existed between Australian and British arsonists. The results indicated that differences did exist and, furthermore, that differences reflected the environmental characteristics of the country from which each sample was drawn. These findings have important theoretical and clinical implications, particularly for the utility of the "4D" model as an investigatory tool and for the wider arson profiling literature.

AB - Since Canter and Fritzon first introduced their "4D" classification system for arson, many studies have replicated the model with samples of arsonists from around the world. However, scholars have reported differences in the offence actions of arsonists across samples. No study as yet has attempted to statically examine the relevance of these differences. Using multidimensional scaling procedures and two-way chi-square contingency analyses, this study examined whether cross-national differences in arson variables existed between Australian and British arsonists. The results indicated that differences did exist and, furthermore, that differences reflected the environmental characteristics of the country from which each sample was drawn. These findings have important theoretical and clinical implications, particularly for the utility of the "4D" model as an investigatory tool and for the wider arson profiling literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906667300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0306624X13487524

DO - 10.1177/0306624X13487524

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 1150

EP - 1165

JO - International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

JF - International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

SN - 0306-624X

IS - 10

ER -