Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy

Elisabeth Isenring, Giordana Cross, Lynne Daniels, Elizabeth Kellett, Bogda Koczwara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Goals of work: To determine the relative validity of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) compared with a full nutrition assessment by the scored Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and to assess MST inter-rater reliability in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients and methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 50 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Inter-rater reliability was assessed in a subsample of 20 patients. Main results: According to PG-SGA global rating, the prevalence of malnutrition was 26%. The MST was a strong predictor of nutritional risk relative to the PG-SGA (100% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 0.8 positive predictive value, 1.0 negative predictive value). MST inter-rater reliability was acceptable with agreement by administration staff/nursing staff/patient and the dietitian in 18/20 cases (kappa=0.83; p0.001). Conclusion: The MST has acceptable relative validity, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity to identify chemotherapy outpatients at risk of malnutrition and, hence, is an acceptable nutrition screening tool in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1152-1156
Number of pages5
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Isenring, Elisabeth ; Cross, Giordana ; Daniels, Lynne ; Kellett, Elizabeth ; Koczwara, Bogda. / Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. In: Supportive Care in Cancer. 2006 ; Vol. 14, No. 11. pp. 1152-1156.
@article{35c02d1df2294a9581997dab35244066,
title = "Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy",
abstract = "Goals of work: To determine the relative validity of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) compared with a full nutrition assessment by the scored Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and to assess MST inter-rater reliability in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients and methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 50 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Inter-rater reliability was assessed in a subsample of 20 patients. Main results: According to PG-SGA global rating, the prevalence of malnutrition was 26{\%}. The MST was a strong predictor of nutritional risk relative to the PG-SGA (100{\%} sensitivity, 92{\%} specificity, 0.8 positive predictive value, 1.0 negative predictive value). MST inter-rater reliability was acceptable with agreement by administration staff/nursing staff/patient and the dietitian in 18/20 cases (kappa=0.83; p0.001). Conclusion: The MST has acceptable relative validity, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity to identify chemotherapy outpatients at risk of malnutrition and, hence, is an acceptable nutrition screening tool in this patient population.",
author = "Elisabeth Isenring and Giordana Cross and Lynne Daniels and Elizabeth Kellett and Bogda Koczwara",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-006-0070-5",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1152--1156",
journal = "Supportive Care in Cancer",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "11",

}

Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. / Isenring, Elisabeth; Cross, Giordana; Daniels, Lynne; Kellett, Elizabeth; Koczwara, Bogda.

In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Vol. 14, No. 11, 11.2006, p. 1152-1156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy

AU - Isenring, Elisabeth

AU - Cross, Giordana

AU - Daniels, Lynne

AU - Kellett, Elizabeth

AU - Koczwara, Bogda

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Goals of work: To determine the relative validity of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) compared with a full nutrition assessment by the scored Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and to assess MST inter-rater reliability in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients and methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 50 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Inter-rater reliability was assessed in a subsample of 20 patients. Main results: According to PG-SGA global rating, the prevalence of malnutrition was 26%. The MST was a strong predictor of nutritional risk relative to the PG-SGA (100% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 0.8 positive predictive value, 1.0 negative predictive value). MST inter-rater reliability was acceptable with agreement by administration staff/nursing staff/patient and the dietitian in 18/20 cases (kappa=0.83; p0.001). Conclusion: The MST has acceptable relative validity, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity to identify chemotherapy outpatients at risk of malnutrition and, hence, is an acceptable nutrition screening tool in this patient population.

AB - Goals of work: To determine the relative validity of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) compared with a full nutrition assessment by the scored Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and to assess MST inter-rater reliability in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients and methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 50 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Inter-rater reliability was assessed in a subsample of 20 patients. Main results: According to PG-SGA global rating, the prevalence of malnutrition was 26%. The MST was a strong predictor of nutritional risk relative to the PG-SGA (100% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 0.8 positive predictive value, 1.0 negative predictive value). MST inter-rater reliability was acceptable with agreement by administration staff/nursing staff/patient and the dietitian in 18/20 cases (kappa=0.83; p0.001). Conclusion: The MST has acceptable relative validity, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity to identify chemotherapy outpatients at risk of malnutrition and, hence, is an acceptable nutrition screening tool in this patient population.

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-006-0070-5

DO - 10.1007/s00520-006-0070-5

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1152

EP - 1156

JO - Supportive Care in Cancer

JF - Supportive Care in Cancer

SN - 0941-4355

IS - 11

ER -