Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy

Elisabeth Isenring*, Giordana Cross, Lynne Daniels, Elizabeth Kellett, Bogda Koczwara

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

129 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Goals of work: To determine the relative validity of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) compared with a full nutrition assessment by the scored Patient Generated-Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and to assess MST inter-rater reliability in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients and methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 50 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Inter-rater reliability was assessed in a subsample of 20 patients. Main results: According to PG-SGA global rating, the prevalence of malnutrition was 26%. The MST was a strong predictor of nutritional risk relative to the PG-SGA (100% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 0.8 positive predictive value, 1.0 negative predictive value). MST inter-rater reliability was acceptable with agreement by administration staff/nursing staff/patient and the dietitian in 18/20 cases (kappa=0.83; p0.001). Conclusion: The MST has acceptable relative validity, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity to identify chemotherapy outpatients at risk of malnutrition and, hence, is an acceptable nutrition screening tool in this patient population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1152-1156
Number of pages5
JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this