TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta- and network meta-analyses: the RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke
AU - The RELEASE Collaborators
AU - Williams, Louise R.
AU - Ali, Myzoon
AU - VandenBerg, Kathryn
AU - Williams, Linda J.
AU - Abo, Masahiro
AU - Becker, Frank
AU - Bowen, Audrey
AU - Brandenburg, Caitlin
AU - Breitenstein, Caterina
AU - Bruehl, Stefanie
AU - Copland, David A.
AU - Cranfill, Tamara B.
AU - Di Pietro-Bachmann, Marie
AU - Enderby, Pamela
AU - Fillingham, Joanne
AU - Galli, Federica Lucia
AU - Gandolfi, Marialuisa
AU - Glize, Bertrand
AU - Godecke, Erin
AU - Hawkins, Neil
AU - Hilari, Katerina
AU - Hinckley, Jacqueline
AU - Horton, Simon
AU - Howard, David
AU - Jaecks, Petra
AU - Jefferies, Elizabeth
AU - Jesus, Luis M.T.
AU - Kambanaros, Maria
AU - Kyoung Kang, Eun
AU - Khedr, Eman M.
AU - Kong, Anthony Pak Hin
AU - Kukkonen, Tarja
AU - Laganaro, Marina
AU - Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.
AU - Laska, Ann Charlotte
AU - Leemann, Béatrice
AU - Leff, Alexander P.
AU - Ribeiro Lima, Roxele
AU - Lorenz, Antje
AU - MacWhinney, Brian
AU - Marshall, Rebecca Shisler
AU - Mattioli, Flavia
AU - Maviş, İlknur
AU - Meinzer, Marcus
AU - Nilipour, Reza
AU - Noé, Enrique
AU - Paik, Nam Jong
AU - Palmer, Rebecca
AU - Papathanasiou, Ilias
AU - Patricio, Brigida F.
AU - Pavão Martins, Isabel
AU - Price, Cathy
AU - Prizl Jakovac, Tatjana
AU - Rochon, Elizabeth
AU - Rose, Miranda L.
AU - Rosso, Charlotte
AU - Rubi-Fessen, Ilona
AU - Ruiter, Marina B.
AU - Snell, Claerwen
AU - Stahl, Benjamin
AU - Szaflarski, Jerzy P.
AU - Thomas, Shirley A.
AU - Van De Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke
AU - Van Der Meulen, Ineke
AU - Visch-Brink, Evy
AU - Worrall, Linda
AU - Wright, Heather Harris
AU - Brady, Marian C.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: Collation of aphasia research data across settings, countries and study designs using big data principles will support analyses across different language modalities, levels of impairment, and therapy interventions in this heterogeneous population. Big data approaches in aphasia research may support vital analyses, which are unachievable within individual trial datasets. However, we lack insight into the requirements for a systematically created database, the feasibility and challenges and potential utility of the type of data collated. Aim: To report the development, preparation and establishment of an internationally agreed aphasia after stroke research database of individual participant data (IPD) to facilitate planned aphasia research analyses. Methods: Data were collated by systematically identifying existing, eligible studies in any language (≥10 IPD, data on time since stroke, and language performance) and included sourcing from relevant aphasia research networks. We invited electronic contributions and also extracted IPD from the public domain. Data were assessed for completeness, validity of value-ranges within variables, and described according to pre-defined categories of demographic data, therapy descriptions, and language domain measurements. We cleaned, clarified, imputed and standardised relevant data in collaboration with the original study investigators. We presented participant, language, stroke, and therapy data characteristics of the final database using summary statistics. Results: From 5256 screened records, 698 datasets were potentially eligible for inclusion; 174 datasets (5928 IPD) from 28 countries were included, 47/174 RCT datasets (1778 IPD) and 91/174 (2834 IPD) included a speech and language therapy (SLT) intervention. Participants’ median age was 63 years (interquartile range [53, 72]), 3407 (61.4%) were male and median recruitment time was 321 days (IQR 30, 1156) after stroke. IPD were available for aphasia severity or ability overall (n = 2699; 80 datasets), naming (n = 2886; 75 datasets), auditory comprehension (n = 2750; 71 datasets), functional communication (n = 1591; 29 datasets), reading (n = 770; 12 datasets) and writing (n = 724; 13 datasets). Information on SLT interventions were described by theoretical approach, therapy target, mode of delivery, setting and provider. Therapy regimen was described according to intensity (1882 IPD; 60 datasets), frequency (2057 IPD; 66 datasets), duration (1960 IPD; 64 datasets) and dosage (1978 IPD; 62 datasets). Discussion: Our international IPD archive demonstrates the application of big data principles in the context of aphasia research; our rigorous methodology for data acquisition and cleaning can serve as a template for the establishment of similar databases in other research areas.
AB - Background: Collation of aphasia research data across settings, countries and study designs using big data principles will support analyses across different language modalities, levels of impairment, and therapy interventions in this heterogeneous population. Big data approaches in aphasia research may support vital analyses, which are unachievable within individual trial datasets. However, we lack insight into the requirements for a systematically created database, the feasibility and challenges and potential utility of the type of data collated. Aim: To report the development, preparation and establishment of an internationally agreed aphasia after stroke research database of individual participant data (IPD) to facilitate planned aphasia research analyses. Methods: Data were collated by systematically identifying existing, eligible studies in any language (≥10 IPD, data on time since stroke, and language performance) and included sourcing from relevant aphasia research networks. We invited electronic contributions and also extracted IPD from the public domain. Data were assessed for completeness, validity of value-ranges within variables, and described according to pre-defined categories of demographic data, therapy descriptions, and language domain measurements. We cleaned, clarified, imputed and standardised relevant data in collaboration with the original study investigators. We presented participant, language, stroke, and therapy data characteristics of the final database using summary statistics. Results: From 5256 screened records, 698 datasets were potentially eligible for inclusion; 174 datasets (5928 IPD) from 28 countries were included, 47/174 RCT datasets (1778 IPD) and 91/174 (2834 IPD) included a speech and language therapy (SLT) intervention. Participants’ median age was 63 years (interquartile range [53, 72]), 3407 (61.4%) were male and median recruitment time was 321 days (IQR 30, 1156) after stroke. IPD were available for aphasia severity or ability overall (n = 2699; 80 datasets), naming (n = 2886; 75 datasets), auditory comprehension (n = 2750; 71 datasets), functional communication (n = 1591; 29 datasets), reading (n = 770; 12 datasets) and writing (n = 724; 13 datasets). Information on SLT interventions were described by theoretical approach, therapy target, mode of delivery, setting and provider. Therapy regimen was described according to intensity (1882 IPD; 60 datasets), frequency (2057 IPD; 66 datasets), duration (1960 IPD; 64 datasets) and dosage (1978 IPD; 62 datasets). Discussion: Our international IPD archive demonstrates the application of big data principles in the context of aphasia research; our rigorous methodology for data acquisition and cleaning can serve as a template for the establishment of similar databases in other research areas.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116729813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081
DO - 10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85116729813
SN - 0268-7038
VL - 36
SP - 513
EP - 533
JO - Aphasiology
JF - Aphasiology
IS - 4
ER -