Using the pairwise comparison method to assess competitive priorities within a supply chain

Hannu Saarijärvi, Hannu Kuusela, Mark T. Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The benefits of seamless integration and the pursuit of a shared strategy within a supply chain are widely recognized, creating, among other things, a hard to replicate competitive advantage. However, achieving this is a difficult task because of the limited means to assess a supply chain's strategic consistency. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe and illustrate how the pairwise comparison method can be used to reveal the consistency (or lack thereof) among supply chain members' perspectives with respect to the importance of different competitive priorities, such as cost versus flexibility. Illuminating where senior decision makers agree and disagree regarding the current versus ideal value creation processes within the supply chain has practical benefits. At a minimum decision makers within the supply chain should be aware of differences in opinions, although for optimal supply chain performance reconciling these differences is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)631-638
Number of pages8
JournalIndustrial Marketing Management
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Competitive priorities
Supply chain
Pairwise comparisons
Decision maker
Supply chain performance
Competitive advantage
Costs
Value creation

Cite this

@article{18c8852fc619494c91a9ebba4fb93956,
title = "Using the pairwise comparison method to assess competitive priorities within a supply chain",
abstract = "The benefits of seamless integration and the pursuit of a shared strategy within a supply chain are widely recognized, creating, among other things, a hard to replicate competitive advantage. However, achieving this is a difficult task because of the limited means to assess a supply chain's strategic consistency. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe and illustrate how the pairwise comparison method can be used to reveal the consistency (or lack thereof) among supply chain members' perspectives with respect to the importance of different competitive priorities, such as cost versus flexibility. Illuminating where senior decision makers agree and disagree regarding the current versus ideal value creation processes within the supply chain has practical benefits. At a minimum decision makers within the supply chain should be aware of differences in opinions, although for optimal supply chain performance reconciling these differences is recommended.",
author = "Hannu Saarij{\"a}rvi and Hannu Kuusela and Spence, {Mark T.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.031",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "631--638",
journal = "Industrial Marketing Management",
issn = "0019-8501",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Using the pairwise comparison method to assess competitive priorities within a supply chain. / Saarijärvi, Hannu; Kuusela, Hannu; Spence, Mark T.

In: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 41, No. 4, 05.2012, p. 631-638.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using the pairwise comparison method to assess competitive priorities within a supply chain

AU - Saarijärvi, Hannu

AU - Kuusela, Hannu

AU - Spence, Mark T.

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - The benefits of seamless integration and the pursuit of a shared strategy within a supply chain are widely recognized, creating, among other things, a hard to replicate competitive advantage. However, achieving this is a difficult task because of the limited means to assess a supply chain's strategic consistency. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe and illustrate how the pairwise comparison method can be used to reveal the consistency (or lack thereof) among supply chain members' perspectives with respect to the importance of different competitive priorities, such as cost versus flexibility. Illuminating where senior decision makers agree and disagree regarding the current versus ideal value creation processes within the supply chain has practical benefits. At a minimum decision makers within the supply chain should be aware of differences in opinions, although for optimal supply chain performance reconciling these differences is recommended.

AB - The benefits of seamless integration and the pursuit of a shared strategy within a supply chain are widely recognized, creating, among other things, a hard to replicate competitive advantage. However, achieving this is a difficult task because of the limited means to assess a supply chain's strategic consistency. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe and illustrate how the pairwise comparison method can be used to reveal the consistency (or lack thereof) among supply chain members' perspectives with respect to the importance of different competitive priorities, such as cost versus flexibility. Illuminating where senior decision makers agree and disagree regarding the current versus ideal value creation processes within the supply chain has practical benefits. At a minimum decision makers within the supply chain should be aware of differences in opinions, although for optimal supply chain performance reconciling these differences is recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862648791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.031

DO - 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.031

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 631

EP - 638

JO - Industrial Marketing Management

JF - Industrial Marketing Management

SN - 0019-8501

IS - 4

ER -