Using dispute systems design to identify, explain and predict trends in the settlement of international commercial disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR initiatives

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper identifies some recent trends in international commercial dispute resolution including efforts to make transnational litigation more attractive, the sense of crisis said to pervade the arbitration community and the growing interest in the use of mediation as an alternative to, or as a component of, arbitration. It takes a critical look at the efforts of UNCITRAL and the ICC to support the use of mediation. Using the theory and principles of dispute systems design, it seeks to explain why UNCITRAL’s Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation and the ICC’s ADR Clauses and Rules have not had a significant impact and why mediation continues to be underused. The paper examines potential obstacles to increased use of mediation, particularly, the lack of recognition given to agreements to mediate and mediated settlement agreements. It concludes with some observations about the future use of mediation and arbitration in the resolution of international commercial disputes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLaw, governance and world order
EditorsS Kierkegaard, M Kierkegaard
Place of PublicationHellerup, Denmark
PublisherInternational Association of IT Lawyers
Pages47-63
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9788799485420
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

mediation
arbitration
trend
Law
lack
community

Cite this

Wolski, B. (2012). Using dispute systems design to identify, explain and predict trends in the settlement of international commercial disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR initiatives. In S. Kierkegaard, & M. Kierkegaard (Eds.), Law, governance and world order (pp. 47-63). Hellerup, Denmark: International Association of IT Lawyers.
Wolski, B. / Using dispute systems design to identify, explain and predict trends in the settlement of international commercial disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR initiatives. Law, governance and world order. editor / S Kierkegaard ; M Kierkegaard. Hellerup, Denmark : International Association of IT Lawyers, 2012. pp. 47-63
@inbook{b8d323a166da4efe9b81b4d483b8d60c,
title = "Using dispute systems design to identify, explain and predict trends in the settlement of international commercial disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR initiatives",
abstract = "This paper identifies some recent trends in international commercial dispute resolution including efforts to make transnational litigation more attractive, the sense of crisis said to pervade the arbitration community and the growing interest in the use of mediation as an alternative to, or as a component of, arbitration. It takes a critical look at the efforts of UNCITRAL and the ICC to support the use of mediation. Using the theory and principles of dispute systems design, it seeks to explain why UNCITRAL’s Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation and the ICC’s ADR Clauses and Rules have not had a significant impact and why mediation continues to be underused. The paper examines potential obstacles to increased use of mediation, particularly, the lack of recognition given to agreements to mediate and mediated settlement agreements. It concludes with some observations about the future use of mediation and arbitration in the resolution of international commercial disputes.",
author = "B Wolski",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788799485420",
pages = "47--63",
editor = "S Kierkegaard and M Kierkegaard",
booktitle = "Law, governance and world order",
publisher = "International Association of IT Lawyers",

}

Wolski, B 2012, Using dispute systems design to identify, explain and predict trends in the settlement of international commercial disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR initiatives. in S Kierkegaard & M Kierkegaard (eds), Law, governance and world order. International Association of IT Lawyers, Hellerup, Denmark, pp. 47-63.

Using dispute systems design to identify, explain and predict trends in the settlement of international commercial disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR initiatives. / Wolski, B.

Law, governance and world order. ed. / S Kierkegaard; M Kierkegaard. Hellerup, Denmark : International Association of IT Lawyers, 2012. p. 47-63.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Using dispute systems design to identify, explain and predict trends in the settlement of international commercial disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR initiatives

AU - Wolski, B

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper identifies some recent trends in international commercial dispute resolution including efforts to make transnational litigation more attractive, the sense of crisis said to pervade the arbitration community and the growing interest in the use of mediation as an alternative to, or as a component of, arbitration. It takes a critical look at the efforts of UNCITRAL and the ICC to support the use of mediation. Using the theory and principles of dispute systems design, it seeks to explain why UNCITRAL’s Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation and the ICC’s ADR Clauses and Rules have not had a significant impact and why mediation continues to be underused. The paper examines potential obstacles to increased use of mediation, particularly, the lack of recognition given to agreements to mediate and mediated settlement agreements. It concludes with some observations about the future use of mediation and arbitration in the resolution of international commercial disputes.

AB - This paper identifies some recent trends in international commercial dispute resolution including efforts to make transnational litigation more attractive, the sense of crisis said to pervade the arbitration community and the growing interest in the use of mediation as an alternative to, or as a component of, arbitration. It takes a critical look at the efforts of UNCITRAL and the ICC to support the use of mediation. Using the theory and principles of dispute systems design, it seeks to explain why UNCITRAL’s Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation and the ICC’s ADR Clauses and Rules have not had a significant impact and why mediation continues to be underused. The paper examines potential obstacles to increased use of mediation, particularly, the lack of recognition given to agreements to mediate and mediated settlement agreements. It concludes with some observations about the future use of mediation and arbitration in the resolution of international commercial disputes.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9788799485420

SP - 47

EP - 63

BT - Law, governance and world order

A2 - Kierkegaard, S

A2 - Kierkegaard, M

PB - International Association of IT Lawyers

CY - Hellerup, Denmark

ER -

Wolski B. Using dispute systems design to identify, explain and predict trends in the settlement of international commercial disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR initiatives. In Kierkegaard S, Kierkegaard M, editors, Law, governance and world order. Hellerup, Denmark: International Association of IT Lawyers. 2012. p. 47-63