Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: A mixed method design

Gina Cleo, Anna Mae Scott, Farhana Islam, Blair Julien, Elaine Beller

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

52 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: New software packages help to improve the efficiency of conducting a systematic review through automation of key steps in the systematic review. The aim of this study was to gather qualitative data on the usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages (Covidence, SRA-Helper for EndNote, Rayyan and RobotAnalyst) for the citation screening step of a systematic review. Methods: We recruited three volunteer systematic reviewers and asked them to use allocated software packages during citation screening. They then completed a 12-item online questionnaire which was tailored to capture data for the software packages used. Findings: All four software packages were reported to be easy or very easy to learn and use. SRA-Helper for EndNote was most favoured by participants for screening citations and Covidence for resolving conflicts. Overall, participants reported that SRA-Helper for EndNote would be their software package of choice, primarily due to its efficiency. Conclusion: This study identified a number of considerations which systematic reviewers can use as a basis of their decision which software to use when performing the citation screening and dispute resolution steps of a systematic review.

Original languageEnglish
Article number145
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Automation
Software
Dissent and Disputes
Volunteers

Cite this

@article{4513863ddc084ff6baafc2a0c420e3e5,
title = "Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages: A mixed method design",
abstract = "Aim: New software packages help to improve the efficiency of conducting a systematic review through automation of key steps in the systematic review. The aim of this study was to gather qualitative data on the usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages (Covidence, SRA-Helper for EndNote, Rayyan and RobotAnalyst) for the citation screening step of a systematic review. Methods: We recruited three volunteer systematic reviewers and asked them to use allocated software packages during citation screening. They then completed a 12-item online questionnaire which was tailored to capture data for the software packages used. Findings: All four software packages were reported to be easy or very easy to learn and use. SRA-Helper for EndNote was most favoured by participants for screening citations and Covidence for resolving conflicts. Overall, participants reported that SRA-Helper for EndNote would be their software package of choice, primarily due to its efficiency. Conclusion: This study identified a number of considerations which systematic reviewers can use as a basis of their decision which software to use when performing the citation screening and dispute resolution steps of a systematic review.",
author = "Gina Cleo and Scott, {Anna Mae} and Farhana Islam and Blair Julien and Elaine Beller",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1186/s13643-019-1069-6",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Systematic Reviews",
issn = "2046-4053",
publisher = "BMC",
number = "1",

}

Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages : A mixed method design. / Cleo, Gina; Scott, Anna Mae; Islam, Farhana; Julien, Blair; Beller, Elaine.

In: Systematic Reviews, Vol. 8, No. 1, 145, 20.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages

T2 - A mixed method design

AU - Cleo, Gina

AU - Scott, Anna Mae

AU - Islam, Farhana

AU - Julien, Blair

AU - Beller, Elaine

PY - 2019/6/20

Y1 - 2019/6/20

N2 - Aim: New software packages help to improve the efficiency of conducting a systematic review through automation of key steps in the systematic review. The aim of this study was to gather qualitative data on the usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages (Covidence, SRA-Helper for EndNote, Rayyan and RobotAnalyst) for the citation screening step of a systematic review. Methods: We recruited three volunteer systematic reviewers and asked them to use allocated software packages during citation screening. They then completed a 12-item online questionnaire which was tailored to capture data for the software packages used. Findings: All four software packages were reported to be easy or very easy to learn and use. SRA-Helper for EndNote was most favoured by participants for screening citations and Covidence for resolving conflicts. Overall, participants reported that SRA-Helper for EndNote would be their software package of choice, primarily due to its efficiency. Conclusion: This study identified a number of considerations which systematic reviewers can use as a basis of their decision which software to use when performing the citation screening and dispute resolution steps of a systematic review.

AB - Aim: New software packages help to improve the efficiency of conducting a systematic review through automation of key steps in the systematic review. The aim of this study was to gather qualitative data on the usability and acceptability of four systematic review automation software packages (Covidence, SRA-Helper for EndNote, Rayyan and RobotAnalyst) for the citation screening step of a systematic review. Methods: We recruited three volunteer systematic reviewers and asked them to use allocated software packages during citation screening. They then completed a 12-item online questionnaire which was tailored to capture data for the software packages used. Findings: All four software packages were reported to be easy or very easy to learn and use. SRA-Helper for EndNote was most favoured by participants for screening citations and Covidence for resolving conflicts. Overall, participants reported that SRA-Helper for EndNote would be their software package of choice, primarily due to its efficiency. Conclusion: This study identified a number of considerations which systematic reviewers can use as a basis of their decision which software to use when performing the citation screening and dispute resolution steps of a systematic review.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067862672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13643-019-1069-6

DO - 10.1186/s13643-019-1069-6

M3 - Review article

VL - 8

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

SN - 2046-4053

IS - 1

M1 - 145

ER -