Uptake and implementation of Advance Care Planning in Australia: Findings of key informant interviews

Joel J. Rhee, Nicholas A. Zwar, Lynn A. Kemp

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. Advance Care Planning (ACP) has an important role in enhancing patient autonomy and guiding end-of-life care. However, there is low uptake of ACP and evidence that advance care plans are often not implemented. We explored these issues in interviews with expert clinicians and representatives of key stakeholder organisations with interest in end-oflife care. Method. Qualitative descriptive study of semi-structured telephone interviews with 23 participants. Results. Participants thought that the low uptake of ACP in Australia is a result of inadequate awareness, societal reluctance to discuss end-of-life issues, and lack of health professionals' involvement in ACP. Problems in implementation of advance care plans were thought to be a result of problems in accessing ACP documents; interpreting written documents; making binding decisions for future unpredictable situations; and paternalistic attitudes of health professionals and families. Participants had different perspectives on how advance care plans should be implemented, with some believing in strict implementation, whereas others believed in a more flexible approach. Implications. Low uptake and poor implementation of advance care plans may be addressed by (1) increasing community awareness; (2) encouraging health professional involvement; and (3) system-wide implementation of multifaceted interventions.Apatient-centred approach to ACP is required to resolve the differences in views on how advance care plans should be implemented.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-104
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Health Review
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Advance Care Planning
Interviews
Attitude to Health
Terminal Care
Family Health
Health
Decision Making
Organizations

Cite this

@article{2075239e4016429ca87f63d88cc3d1da,
title = "Uptake and implementation of Advance Care Planning in Australia: Findings of key informant interviews",
abstract = "Objective. Advance Care Planning (ACP) has an important role in enhancing patient autonomy and guiding end-of-life care. However, there is low uptake of ACP and evidence that advance care plans are often not implemented. We explored these issues in interviews with expert clinicians and representatives of key stakeholder organisations with interest in end-oflife care. Method. Qualitative descriptive study of semi-structured telephone interviews with 23 participants. Results. Participants thought that the low uptake of ACP in Australia is a result of inadequate awareness, societal reluctance to discuss end-of-life issues, and lack of health professionals' involvement in ACP. Problems in implementation of advance care plans were thought to be a result of problems in accessing ACP documents; interpreting written documents; making binding decisions for future unpredictable situations; and paternalistic attitudes of health professionals and families. Participants had different perspectives on how advance care plans should be implemented, with some believing in strict implementation, whereas others believed in a more flexible approach. Implications. Low uptake and poor implementation of advance care plans may be addressed by (1) increasing community awareness; (2) encouraging health professional involvement; and (3) system-wide implementation of multifaceted interventions.Apatient-centred approach to ACP is required to resolve the differences in views on how advance care plans should be implemented.",
author = "Rhee, {Joel J.} and Zwar, {Nicholas A.} and Kemp, {Lynn A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1071/AH11019",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "98--104",
journal = "Australia and New Zealand Health Policy",
issn = "1743-8462",
publisher = "CSIRO Publishing",
number = "1",

}

Uptake and implementation of Advance Care Planning in Australia : Findings of key informant interviews. / Rhee, Joel J.; Zwar, Nicholas A.; Kemp, Lynn A.

In: Australian Health Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 05.03.2012, p. 98-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uptake and implementation of Advance Care Planning in Australia

T2 - Findings of key informant interviews

AU - Rhee, Joel J.

AU - Zwar, Nicholas A.

AU - Kemp, Lynn A.

PY - 2012/3/5

Y1 - 2012/3/5

N2 - Objective. Advance Care Planning (ACP) has an important role in enhancing patient autonomy and guiding end-of-life care. However, there is low uptake of ACP and evidence that advance care plans are often not implemented. We explored these issues in interviews with expert clinicians and representatives of key stakeholder organisations with interest in end-oflife care. Method. Qualitative descriptive study of semi-structured telephone interviews with 23 participants. Results. Participants thought that the low uptake of ACP in Australia is a result of inadequate awareness, societal reluctance to discuss end-of-life issues, and lack of health professionals' involvement in ACP. Problems in implementation of advance care plans were thought to be a result of problems in accessing ACP documents; interpreting written documents; making binding decisions for future unpredictable situations; and paternalistic attitudes of health professionals and families. Participants had different perspectives on how advance care plans should be implemented, with some believing in strict implementation, whereas others believed in a more flexible approach. Implications. Low uptake and poor implementation of advance care plans may be addressed by (1) increasing community awareness; (2) encouraging health professional involvement; and (3) system-wide implementation of multifaceted interventions.Apatient-centred approach to ACP is required to resolve the differences in views on how advance care plans should be implemented.

AB - Objective. Advance Care Planning (ACP) has an important role in enhancing patient autonomy and guiding end-of-life care. However, there is low uptake of ACP and evidence that advance care plans are often not implemented. We explored these issues in interviews with expert clinicians and representatives of key stakeholder organisations with interest in end-oflife care. Method. Qualitative descriptive study of semi-structured telephone interviews with 23 participants. Results. Participants thought that the low uptake of ACP in Australia is a result of inadequate awareness, societal reluctance to discuss end-of-life issues, and lack of health professionals' involvement in ACP. Problems in implementation of advance care plans were thought to be a result of problems in accessing ACP documents; interpreting written documents; making binding decisions for future unpredictable situations; and paternalistic attitudes of health professionals and families. Participants had different perspectives on how advance care plans should be implemented, with some believing in strict implementation, whereas others believed in a more flexible approach. Implications. Low uptake and poor implementation of advance care plans may be addressed by (1) increasing community awareness; (2) encouraging health professional involvement; and (3) system-wide implementation of multifaceted interventions.Apatient-centred approach to ACP is required to resolve the differences in views on how advance care plans should be implemented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857541437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/AH11019

DO - 10.1071/AH11019

M3 - Review article

VL - 36

SP - 98

EP - 104

JO - Australia and New Zealand Health Policy

JF - Australia and New Zealand Health Policy

SN - 1743-8462

IS - 1

ER -