Untangling causality in design science theorizing

Dirk Hovorka, Shirley Gregor

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although Design Science Research aims to create new knowledge through design and evaluation of artefacts, the causal agency through which artefacts obtain predicted outcomes is frequently underspecified. Within this domain of knowledge, six types of causal reasoning can be applied by researchers to more clearly articulate why desired outcomes will result from the implementation of the artefact. In addition, reflecting on the causal foundations for the design will enable more definitive evaluation of the design theory and for scientific explanation of the behavior of the artefact-in-use. The proposed framework is based on an extensive literature in causal theory and the implications discussed will enable researchers to articulate the causal reasoning used in Design Science theorizing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-16
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - 2010
EventBiennial ANU Workshop of Information Systems Foundations: Theory building in information systems - Canberra, Australia
Duration: 30 Sep 20101 Oct 2010
Conference number: 5th

Conference

ConferenceBiennial ANU Workshop of Information Systems Foundations
CountryAustralia
CityCanberra
Period30/09/101/10/10

Cite this

Hovorka, D., & Gregor, S. (2010). Untangling causality in design science theorizing. 1-16. Paper presented at Biennial ANU Workshop of Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia.
Hovorka, Dirk ; Gregor, Shirley. / Untangling causality in design science theorizing. Paper presented at Biennial ANU Workshop of Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia.16 p.
@conference{71157d541665496e8a9e98e76807e472,
title = "Untangling causality in design science theorizing",
abstract = "Although Design Science Research aims to create new knowledge through design and evaluation of artefacts, the causal agency through which artefacts obtain predicted outcomes is frequently underspecified. Within this domain of knowledge, six types of causal reasoning can be applied by researchers to more clearly articulate why desired outcomes will result from the implementation of the artefact. In addition, reflecting on the causal foundations for the design will enable more definitive evaluation of the design theory and for scientific explanation of the behavior of the artefact-in-use. The proposed framework is based on an extensive literature in causal theory and the implications discussed will enable researchers to articulate the causal reasoning used in Design Science theorizing.",
author = "Dirk Hovorka and Shirley Gregor",
note = "{\circledC} Copyright Dirk Hovorka & Shirley Gregor, 2010; Biennial ANU Workshop of Information Systems Foundations : Theory building in information systems ; Conference date: 30-09-2010 Through 01-10-2010",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
pages = "1--16",

}

Hovorka, D & Gregor, S 2010, 'Untangling causality in design science theorizing' Paper presented at Biennial ANU Workshop of Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia, 30/09/10 - 1/10/10, pp. 1-16.

Untangling causality in design science theorizing. / Hovorka, Dirk; Gregor, Shirley.

2010. 1-16 Paper presented at Biennial ANU Workshop of Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Untangling causality in design science theorizing

AU - Hovorka, Dirk

AU - Gregor, Shirley

N1 - © Copyright Dirk Hovorka & Shirley Gregor, 2010

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Although Design Science Research aims to create new knowledge through design and evaluation of artefacts, the causal agency through which artefacts obtain predicted outcomes is frequently underspecified. Within this domain of knowledge, six types of causal reasoning can be applied by researchers to more clearly articulate why desired outcomes will result from the implementation of the artefact. In addition, reflecting on the causal foundations for the design will enable more definitive evaluation of the design theory and for scientific explanation of the behavior of the artefact-in-use. The proposed framework is based on an extensive literature in causal theory and the implications discussed will enable researchers to articulate the causal reasoning used in Design Science theorizing.

AB - Although Design Science Research aims to create new knowledge through design and evaluation of artefacts, the causal agency through which artefacts obtain predicted outcomes is frequently underspecified. Within this domain of knowledge, six types of causal reasoning can be applied by researchers to more clearly articulate why desired outcomes will result from the implementation of the artefact. In addition, reflecting on the causal foundations for the design will enable more definitive evaluation of the design theory and for scientific explanation of the behavior of the artefact-in-use. The proposed framework is based on an extensive literature in causal theory and the implications discussed will enable researchers to articulate the causal reasoning used in Design Science theorizing.

M3 - Paper

SP - 1

EP - 16

ER -

Hovorka D, Gregor S. Untangling causality in design science theorizing. 2010. Paper presented at Biennial ANU Workshop of Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia.