Understanding the Legal Information Experience of Non-Lawyers: Lessons from the Family Law Context

Jonathan Crowe, Rachael M Field, Lisa Toohey, Helen Partridge, Lynn McAllister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Parties to legal disputes, now more than ever before, are able to access information about the law. This article reports on an empirical study of experiences in relation to accessing legal information in a family law context. A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with people who rang the Australian Federal Government’s Family Relationships Advice Line indicated five key issues: first, parties struggle with the complexity of the information experience; secondly, parties have difficulty in assessing the credibility and reliability of sources of information and the information provided; thirdly, parties indicate clear source preferences; fourthly, parties have difficulty applying the information retrieved from various sources to their individual situation; and, finally, parties tend to use language that is no longer reflected in family law legislation or practice. These findings are discussed and analysed with reference to the specific voice of the study participants. The findings should assist government agencies, family dispute resolution providers and others to improve the ways legal information and advice on post-separation issues is provided. The findings are also applicable to other contexts of legal information provision
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-147
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Judicial Administration
Volume27
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

family law
lawyer
experience
government agency
qualitative interview
source of information
Federal Government
credibility
legislation
Law
language

Cite this

@article{cc04505f76b748d59679880d6509c84f,
title = "Understanding the Legal Information Experience of Non-Lawyers: Lessons from the Family Law Context",
abstract = "Parties to legal disputes, now more than ever before, are able to access information about the law. This article reports on an empirical study of experiences in relation to accessing legal information in a family law context. A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with people who rang the Australian Federal Government’s Family Relationships Advice Line indicated five key issues: first, parties struggle with the complexity of the information experience; secondly, parties have difficulty in assessing the credibility and reliability of sources of information and the information provided; thirdly, parties indicate clear source preferences; fourthly, parties have difficulty applying the information retrieved from various sources to their individual situation; and, finally, parties tend to use language that is no longer reflected in family law legislation or practice. These findings are discussed and analysed with reference to the specific voice of the study participants. The findings should assist government agencies, family dispute resolution providers and others to improve the ways legal information and advice on post-separation issues is provided. The findings are also applicable to other contexts of legal information provision",
author = "Jonathan Crowe and Field, {Rachael M} and Lisa Toohey and Helen Partridge and Lynn McAllister",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "137--147",
journal = "Journal of Judicial Administration",
issn = "1036-7918",
publisher = "Lawbook Co.",
number = "4",

}

Understanding the Legal Information Experience of Non-Lawyers: Lessons from the Family Law Context. / Crowe, Jonathan; Field, Rachael M; Toohey, Lisa; Partridge, Helen; McAllister, Lynn.

In: Journal of Judicial Administration, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2018, p. 137-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the Legal Information Experience of Non-Lawyers: Lessons from the Family Law Context

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

AU - Field, Rachael M

AU - Toohey, Lisa

AU - Partridge, Helen

AU - McAllister, Lynn

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Parties to legal disputes, now more than ever before, are able to access information about the law. This article reports on an empirical study of experiences in relation to accessing legal information in a family law context. A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with people who rang the Australian Federal Government’s Family Relationships Advice Line indicated five key issues: first, parties struggle with the complexity of the information experience; secondly, parties have difficulty in assessing the credibility and reliability of sources of information and the information provided; thirdly, parties indicate clear source preferences; fourthly, parties have difficulty applying the information retrieved from various sources to their individual situation; and, finally, parties tend to use language that is no longer reflected in family law legislation or practice. These findings are discussed and analysed with reference to the specific voice of the study participants. The findings should assist government agencies, family dispute resolution providers and others to improve the ways legal information and advice on post-separation issues is provided. The findings are also applicable to other contexts of legal information provision

AB - Parties to legal disputes, now more than ever before, are able to access information about the law. This article reports on an empirical study of experiences in relation to accessing legal information in a family law context. A thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with people who rang the Australian Federal Government’s Family Relationships Advice Line indicated five key issues: first, parties struggle with the complexity of the information experience; secondly, parties have difficulty in assessing the credibility and reliability of sources of information and the information provided; thirdly, parties indicate clear source preferences; fourthly, parties have difficulty applying the information retrieved from various sources to their individual situation; and, finally, parties tend to use language that is no longer reflected in family law legislation or practice. These findings are discussed and analysed with reference to the specific voice of the study participants. The findings should assist government agencies, family dispute resolution providers and others to improve the ways legal information and advice on post-separation issues is provided. The findings are also applicable to other contexts of legal information provision

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 137

EP - 147

JO - Journal of Judicial Administration

JF - Journal of Judicial Administration

SN - 1036-7918

IS - 4

ER -