Understanding researchers' perceptions and experiences in finance research replication studies: A pre-registered study

Daniel Chai*, Searat Ali*, Mark Brosnan, Tim Hasso

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This pre-registered study executes the empirical design approved in the associated pre-registered report (Chai et al., 2024) to survey authors of replication studies at the Pacific-Basin Finance Journal (PBFJ). The survey aims to understand their motivations, challenges encountered, and perceived benefits, as well as their evaluations of the replication framework. The findings reveal strong support for replication studies, with participants emphasizing their role in fostering a more robust research culture in financial economics. However, challenges in reproduction and replication frequently arise due to issues with the accessibility and quality of open-source materials provided in the original studies. Our results also suggest that PBFJ's initiative offers a replicable model for other journals, providing actionable insights to address the replication crisis. Key recommendations include providing academic recognition for replication work, standardizing data transparency mandates, and promoting cross-disciplinary dialogue on robust research practices.
Original languageEnglish
Article number103061
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalPacific Basin Finance Journal
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Jan 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding researchers' perceptions and experiences in finance research replication studies: A pre-registered study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this