Ultraviolet index and location are important determinants of vitamin D status in people with human immunodeficiency virus

Karen M. Klassen*, Christopher K. Fairley, Michael G. Kimlin, Mark Kelly, Tim R.H. Read, Jennifer Broom, Darren B. Russell, Peter R. Ebeling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to document the vitamin D status of HIV-infected individuals across a wide latitude range in one country and to examine associated risk factors for low vitamin D. Using data from patients attending four HIV specialist clinics across a wide latitude range in Australia, we constructed logistic regression models to investigate risk factors associated with 25(OH)D < 75 nmol L-1. 1788 patients were included; 87% were male, 76% Caucasian and 72% on antiretroviral therapy. The proportion with 25(OH)D < 50 nmol L-1 was 27%, and <75 nmol L-1 was 54%. Living in Melbourne compared with Cairns (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.30; 95% CI 2.18, 4.99, P < 0.001) and non-Caucasian origin (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 2.12, 3.75, P < 0.001) was associated with an increased risk, while extreme UV index compared with low UV index was associated with a reduced risk (aOR 0.33; 95% CI 0.20, 0.55, P < 0.001) of 25(OH)D < 75 nmol L-1. In those with biochemistry available (n = 1117), antiretroviral therapy was associated with 25(OH)D < 75 nmol L-1; however, this association was modified by serum cholesterol status. Location and UV index were the strongest factors associated with 25(OH)D < 75 nmol L-1. Cholesterol, the product of an alternative steroid pathway with a common precursor steroid, modified the effect of antiretroviral therapy on serum 25(OH)D.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)431-437
Number of pages7
JournalPhotochemistry and Photobiology
Volume91
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ultraviolet index and location are important determinants of vitamin D status in people with human immunodeficiency virus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this