Twelve tips for implementing a patient safety curriculum in an undergraduate programme in medicine

Gerry Armitage, Alison Cracknell, Kirsty Forrest, John Sandars

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Patient safety is a major priority for health services. It is a multi-disciplinary problem and requires a multi-disciplinary solution; any education should therefore be a multi-disciplinary endeavour, from conception to implementation. The starting point should be at undergraduate level and medical education should not be an exception. It is apparent that current educational provision in patient safety lacks a systematic approach, is not linked to formal assessment and is detached from the reality of practice. If patient safety education is to be fit for purpose, it should link theory and the reality of practice; a human factors approach offers a framework to create this linkage. Learning outcomes should be competency based and generic content explicitly linked to specific patient safety content. Students should ultimately be able to demonstrate the impact of what they learn in improving their clinical performance. It is essential that the patient safety curriculum spans the entire undergraduate programme; we argue here for a spiral model incorporating innovative, multi-method assessment which examines knowledge, skills, attitudes and values. Students are increasingly learning from patient experiences, we advocate learning directly from patients wherever possible. Undergraduate provision should provide a platform for continuing education in patient safety, all of which should be subject to periodic evaluation with a particular emphasis on practice impact.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-540
Number of pages6
JournalMedical Teacher
Volume33
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Safety
Curriculum
Medicine
medicine
curriculum
education
Learning
learning
Undergraduate Medical Education
Students
Education
health service
student
Continuing Education
Patient Education
Health Services
lack
evaluation
performance
Values

Cite this

Armitage, Gerry ; Cracknell, Alison ; Forrest, Kirsty ; Sandars, John. / Twelve tips for implementing a patient safety curriculum in an undergraduate programme in medicine. In: Medical Teacher. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 7. pp. 535-540.
@article{b1565f76ba4b451698d49ceabf3da7e1,
title = "Twelve tips for implementing a patient safety curriculum in an undergraduate programme in medicine",
abstract = "Patient safety is a major priority for health services. It is a multi-disciplinary problem and requires a multi-disciplinary solution; any education should therefore be a multi-disciplinary endeavour, from conception to implementation. The starting point should be at undergraduate level and medical education should not be an exception. It is apparent that current educational provision in patient safety lacks a systematic approach, is not linked to formal assessment and is detached from the reality of practice. If patient safety education is to be fit for purpose, it should link theory and the reality of practice; a human factors approach offers a framework to create this linkage. Learning outcomes should be competency based and generic content explicitly linked to specific patient safety content. Students should ultimately be able to demonstrate the impact of what they learn in improving their clinical performance. It is essential that the patient safety curriculum spans the entire undergraduate programme; we argue here for a spiral model incorporating innovative, multi-method assessment which examines knowledge, skills, attitudes and values. Students are increasingly learning from patient experiences, we advocate learning directly from patients wherever possible. Undergraduate provision should provide a platform for continuing education in patient safety, all of which should be subject to periodic evaluation with a particular emphasis on practice impact.",
author = "Gerry Armitage and Alison Cracknell and Kirsty Forrest and John Sandars",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.3109/0142159X.2010.546449",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "535--540",
journal = "Medical Teacher",
issn = "0142-159X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "7",

}

Twelve tips for implementing a patient safety curriculum in an undergraduate programme in medicine. / Armitage, Gerry; Cracknell, Alison; Forrest, Kirsty; Sandars, John.

In: Medical Teacher, Vol. 33, No. 7, 07.2011, p. 535-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twelve tips for implementing a patient safety curriculum in an undergraduate programme in medicine

AU - Armitage, Gerry

AU - Cracknell, Alison

AU - Forrest, Kirsty

AU - Sandars, John

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Patient safety is a major priority for health services. It is a multi-disciplinary problem and requires a multi-disciplinary solution; any education should therefore be a multi-disciplinary endeavour, from conception to implementation. The starting point should be at undergraduate level and medical education should not be an exception. It is apparent that current educational provision in patient safety lacks a systematic approach, is not linked to formal assessment and is detached from the reality of practice. If patient safety education is to be fit for purpose, it should link theory and the reality of practice; a human factors approach offers a framework to create this linkage. Learning outcomes should be competency based and generic content explicitly linked to specific patient safety content. Students should ultimately be able to demonstrate the impact of what they learn in improving their clinical performance. It is essential that the patient safety curriculum spans the entire undergraduate programme; we argue here for a spiral model incorporating innovative, multi-method assessment which examines knowledge, skills, attitudes and values. Students are increasingly learning from patient experiences, we advocate learning directly from patients wherever possible. Undergraduate provision should provide a platform for continuing education in patient safety, all of which should be subject to periodic evaluation with a particular emphasis on practice impact.

AB - Patient safety is a major priority for health services. It is a multi-disciplinary problem and requires a multi-disciplinary solution; any education should therefore be a multi-disciplinary endeavour, from conception to implementation. The starting point should be at undergraduate level and medical education should not be an exception. It is apparent that current educational provision in patient safety lacks a systematic approach, is not linked to formal assessment and is detached from the reality of practice. If patient safety education is to be fit for purpose, it should link theory and the reality of practice; a human factors approach offers a framework to create this linkage. Learning outcomes should be competency based and generic content explicitly linked to specific patient safety content. Students should ultimately be able to demonstrate the impact of what they learn in improving their clinical performance. It is essential that the patient safety curriculum spans the entire undergraduate programme; we argue here for a spiral model incorporating innovative, multi-method assessment which examines knowledge, skills, attitudes and values. Students are increasingly learning from patient experiences, we advocate learning directly from patients wherever possible. Undergraduate provision should provide a platform for continuing education in patient safety, all of which should be subject to periodic evaluation with a particular emphasis on practice impact.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959507980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/0142159X.2010.546449

DO - 10.3109/0142159X.2010.546449

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 535

EP - 540

JO - Medical Teacher

JF - Medical Teacher

SN - 0142-159X

IS - 7

ER -