Trial by motive

David Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the implications of the High Court ruling in The Queen v Baden-Clay (‘Baden-Clay’) for future murder accused with strong motives for killing their spouses who deny all knowledge of their deaths. The article argues that apart from underlining the risk run by any criminal accused who opts to remain silent at their trial, the reasoning of the Court has left open the possibility that a conviction of murder could become a ‘default’ verdict under Queensland law in the absence of clear evidence of manslaughter, once the act of homicide has been proved. It has also provided a ‘pro-Crown’ precedent for future cases in which a conviction may be obtained by means of items of purely circumstantial evidence, not all of which are established beyond reasonable doubt.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages19
JournalBond Law Review
Volume29
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

homicide
Baden
accused
spouse
evidence
death
Law

Cite this

Field, D. (2017). Trial by motive. Bond Law Review, 29(2), 1-18.
Field, David. / Trial by motive. In: Bond Law Review. 2017 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 1-18.
@article{09ebfcf76008469d8e64aea80b824b6c,
title = "Trial by motive",
abstract = "This article examines the implications of the High Court ruling in The Queen v Baden-Clay (‘Baden-Clay’) for future murder accused with strong motives for killing their spouses who deny all knowledge of their deaths. The article argues that apart from underlining the risk run by any criminal accused who opts to remain silent at their trial, the reasoning of the Court has left open the possibility that a conviction of murder could become a ‘default’ verdict under Queensland law in the absence of clear evidence of manslaughter, once the act of homicide has been proved. It has also provided a ‘pro-Crown’ precedent for future cases in which a conviction may be obtained by means of items of purely circumstantial evidence, not all of which are established beyond reasonable doubt.",
author = "David Field",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Bond Law Review",
issn = "1033-4505",
publisher = "Bond University Press",
number = "2",

}

Field, D 2017, 'Trial by motive' Bond Law Review, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1-18.

Trial by motive. / Field, David.

In: Bond Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2017, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trial by motive

AU - Field, David

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article examines the implications of the High Court ruling in The Queen v Baden-Clay (‘Baden-Clay’) for future murder accused with strong motives for killing their spouses who deny all knowledge of their deaths. The article argues that apart from underlining the risk run by any criminal accused who opts to remain silent at their trial, the reasoning of the Court has left open the possibility that a conviction of murder could become a ‘default’ verdict under Queensland law in the absence of clear evidence of manslaughter, once the act of homicide has been proved. It has also provided a ‘pro-Crown’ precedent for future cases in which a conviction may be obtained by means of items of purely circumstantial evidence, not all of which are established beyond reasonable doubt.

AB - This article examines the implications of the High Court ruling in The Queen v Baden-Clay (‘Baden-Clay’) for future murder accused with strong motives for killing their spouses who deny all knowledge of their deaths. The article argues that apart from underlining the risk run by any criminal accused who opts to remain silent at their trial, the reasoning of the Court has left open the possibility that a conviction of murder could become a ‘default’ verdict under Queensland law in the absence of clear evidence of manslaughter, once the act of homicide has been proved. It has also provided a ‘pro-Crown’ precedent for future cases in which a conviction may be obtained by means of items of purely circumstantial evidence, not all of which are established beyond reasonable doubt.

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Bond Law Review

JF - Bond Law Review

SN - 1033-4505

IS - 2

ER -

Field D. Trial by motive. Bond Law Review. 2017;29(2):1-18.