Trends in knee magnetic resonance imaging, arthroscopies and joint replacements in older Australians: Still too much low-value care?

Leon Smith*, Alexandra Barratt, Rachelle Buchbinder, Ian A. Harris, Jenny Doust, Katy Bell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The objective of the study is to describe temporal trends and regional variations in the use of knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), knee arthroscopy and total knee replacement surgery in Australians older than 55 years. Methods: Design: A retrospective descriptive study using routinely collected administrative data. Main outcome measures: Age-standardized rates of knee MRI, knee arthroscopy and knee replacement surgery from 2003 to 2017. Results: Knee MRI rates increased from 216/100 000 in 2003, to 1509/100 000 in 2017 (sevenfold relative increase). Knee arthroscopy rates initially increased from 372/100 000 in 2003 to a maximum of 475/100 000 in 2011, before declining to 283/100 000 in 2017. Knee joint replacement surgery increased from 535/100 000 in 2003 to 840/100 000 in 2017 (57% relative increase). The use of MRI increased in all regions of Australia but to differing extents. Knee arthroscopy rates declined in all regions from 2011, but to differing extents. Knee joint replacement surgery increased at roughly the same rate across Australia. Conclusion: Knee arthroscopy rates increased before declining modestly in more recent years, most likely in response to evidence against its effectiveness. Knee MRI rates have continued to increase despite consistent recommendations against their routine use in the evaluation of knee pain. Future research could investigate potential drivers of the increased use of MRI, and of the continued use of arthroscopy. Further exploration of the extent to which either procedure explains the increase in numbers of knee joint replacements is also warranted.

Original languageEnglish
JournalANZ Journal of Surgery
Early online date16 Feb 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Feb 2020

    Fingerprint

Cite this