TY - JOUR
T1 - Transparent development of the WHO rapid advice guidelines
AU - Schünemann, Holger J.
AU - Hill, Suzanne R.
AU - Kakad, Meetali
AU - Vist, Gunn E.
AU - Bellamy, Richard
AU - Stockman, Lauren
AU - Wisløff, Torbjørn Fosen
AU - Del Mar, Chris Del
AU - Hayden, Frederick
AU - Uyeki, Timothy M.
AU - Farrar, Jeremy
AU - Yazdanpanah, Yazdan
AU - Zucker, Howard
AU - Beigel, John
AU - Chotpitayasunondh, Tawee
AU - Tran, Tinh Hien
AU - Özbay, Bülent
AU - Sugaya, Norio
AU - Oxman, Andrew D.
PY - 2007/5
Y1 - 2007/5
N2 - Emerging health problems require rapid advice. We describe the development and pilot testing of a systematic, transparent approach used by the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop rapid advice guidelines in response to requests from member states confronted with uncertainty about the pharmacological management of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection. We first searched for systematic reviews of randomized trials of treatment and prevention of seasonal influenza and for non-trial evidence on H5N1 infection, including case reports and animal and in vitro studies. A panel of clinical experts, clinicians with experience in treating patients with H5N1, influenza researchers, and methodologists was convened for a two-day meeting. Panel members reviewed the evidence prior to the meeting and agreed on the process. It took one month to put together a team to prepare the evidence profiles (i.e., summaries of the evidence on important clinical and policy questions), and it took the team only five weeks to prepare and revise the evidence profiles and to prepare draft guidelines prior to the panel meeting. A draft manuscript for publication was prepared within 10 days following the panel meeting. Strengths of the process include its transparency and the short amount of time used to prepare these WHO guidelines. The process could be improved by shortening the time required to commission evidence profiles. Further development is needed to facilitate stakeholder involvement, and evaluate and ensure the guideline's usefulness.
AB - Emerging health problems require rapid advice. We describe the development and pilot testing of a systematic, transparent approach used by the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop rapid advice guidelines in response to requests from member states confronted with uncertainty about the pharmacological management of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection. We first searched for systematic reviews of randomized trials of treatment and prevention of seasonal influenza and for non-trial evidence on H5N1 infection, including case reports and animal and in vitro studies. A panel of clinical experts, clinicians with experience in treating patients with H5N1, influenza researchers, and methodologists was convened for a two-day meeting. Panel members reviewed the evidence prior to the meeting and agreed on the process. It took one month to put together a team to prepare the evidence profiles (i.e., summaries of the evidence on important clinical and policy questions), and it took the team only five weeks to prepare and revise the evidence profiles and to prepare draft guidelines prior to the panel meeting. A draft manuscript for publication was prepared within 10 days following the panel meeting. Strengths of the process include its transparency and the short amount of time used to prepare these WHO guidelines. The process could be improved by shortening the time required to commission evidence profiles. Further development is needed to facilitate stakeholder involvement, and evaluate and ensure the guideline's usefulness.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249672390&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040119
DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040119
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17535099
AN - SCOPUS:34249672390
SN - 1549-1277
VL - 4
SP - 786
EP - 793
JO - PLoS Medicine
JF - PLoS Medicine
IS - 5
ER -