“TOXIC” workplaces: The negative interface between the physical and social environments

Linda Too, Michael Harvey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Toxic real estate has been used as a negative phrase to describe non-performing assets on a firm's balance sheet. Today there is another form of “TOXIC” real estate that needs management's attention, i.e. physical workplaces that are harmful to employees on a day-in and day-out basis. Particularly when productivity of workforce is now central to business competitiveness, it is timely to explore the interface between physical and social environments as many of the social/psychological impacts on employees have not been recognized or calibrated. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the links between physical workplace and social behaviour. In this conceptual paper, current literature relating to corporate real estate and environmental psychology are reviewed to investigate the links between physical workplace and social behaviour. The findings are synthesised to present a framework for understanding the cause of toxicity in the workplace and a self-auditing preventive strategy. This article argued that there is a link between physical workplace and the social behaviour of employees. Arising from toxic workplaces, two dysfunctional social behaviours are highlighted, i.e. bullying and destructive leadership. The paper then presents a logical plan to monitor and remediate these “TOXIC” conditions in the physical environment. This paper is original in its angle to which social behaviour is juxtaposed against physical environment. In particular, by examining the negative interface, it informs managers of the risks to avoid and therefore identifies the baseline for which the physical workplace must be managed. It also makes a practical contribution by its development of a self-auditing framework to avoid toxic workplaces.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-181
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Corporate Real Estate
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Physical environment
Social environment
Work place
Real estate
Employees
Auditing
Environmental psychology
Managers
Workforce
Balance sheet
Bullying
Competitiveness
Logic
Psychological
Assets
Productivity
Toxicity

Cite this

@article{60f010903bde4accbbd7501e47712183,
title = "“TOXIC” workplaces: The negative interface between the physical and social environments",
abstract = "Toxic real estate has been used as a negative phrase to describe non-performing assets on a firm's balance sheet. Today there is another form of “TOXIC” real estate that needs management's attention, i.e. physical workplaces that are harmful to employees on a day-in and day-out basis. Particularly when productivity of workforce is now central to business competitiveness, it is timely to explore the interface between physical and social environments as many of the social/psychological impacts on employees have not been recognized or calibrated. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the links between physical workplace and social behaviour. In this conceptual paper, current literature relating to corporate real estate and environmental psychology are reviewed to investigate the links between physical workplace and social behaviour. The findings are synthesised to present a framework for understanding the cause of toxicity in the workplace and a self-auditing preventive strategy. This article argued that there is a link between physical workplace and the social behaviour of employees. Arising from toxic workplaces, two dysfunctional social behaviours are highlighted, i.e. bullying and destructive leadership. The paper then presents a logical plan to monitor and remediate these “TOXIC” conditions in the physical environment. This paper is original in its angle to which social behaviour is juxtaposed against physical environment. In particular, by examining the negative interface, it informs managers of the risks to avoid and therefore identifies the baseline for which the physical workplace must be managed. It also makes a practical contribution by its development of a self-auditing framework to avoid toxic workplaces.",
author = "Linda Too and Michael Harvey",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1108/14630011211285834",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "171--181",
journal = "Journal of Corporate Real Estate",
issn = "1463-001X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

“TOXIC” workplaces : The negative interface between the physical and social environments. / Too, Linda; Harvey, Michael.

In: Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 14, No. 3, 07.09.2012, p. 171-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - “TOXIC” workplaces

T2 - The negative interface between the physical and social environments

AU - Too, Linda

AU - Harvey, Michael

PY - 2012/9/7

Y1 - 2012/9/7

N2 - Toxic real estate has been used as a negative phrase to describe non-performing assets on a firm's balance sheet. Today there is another form of “TOXIC” real estate that needs management's attention, i.e. physical workplaces that are harmful to employees on a day-in and day-out basis. Particularly when productivity of workforce is now central to business competitiveness, it is timely to explore the interface between physical and social environments as many of the social/psychological impacts on employees have not been recognized or calibrated. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the links between physical workplace and social behaviour. In this conceptual paper, current literature relating to corporate real estate and environmental psychology are reviewed to investigate the links between physical workplace and social behaviour. The findings are synthesised to present a framework for understanding the cause of toxicity in the workplace and a self-auditing preventive strategy. This article argued that there is a link between physical workplace and the social behaviour of employees. Arising from toxic workplaces, two dysfunctional social behaviours are highlighted, i.e. bullying and destructive leadership. The paper then presents a logical plan to monitor and remediate these “TOXIC” conditions in the physical environment. This paper is original in its angle to which social behaviour is juxtaposed against physical environment. In particular, by examining the negative interface, it informs managers of the risks to avoid and therefore identifies the baseline for which the physical workplace must be managed. It also makes a practical contribution by its development of a self-auditing framework to avoid toxic workplaces.

AB - Toxic real estate has been used as a negative phrase to describe non-performing assets on a firm's balance sheet. Today there is another form of “TOXIC” real estate that needs management's attention, i.e. physical workplaces that are harmful to employees on a day-in and day-out basis. Particularly when productivity of workforce is now central to business competitiveness, it is timely to explore the interface between physical and social environments as many of the social/psychological impacts on employees have not been recognized or calibrated. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the links between physical workplace and social behaviour. In this conceptual paper, current literature relating to corporate real estate and environmental psychology are reviewed to investigate the links between physical workplace and social behaviour. The findings are synthesised to present a framework for understanding the cause of toxicity in the workplace and a self-auditing preventive strategy. This article argued that there is a link between physical workplace and the social behaviour of employees. Arising from toxic workplaces, two dysfunctional social behaviours are highlighted, i.e. bullying and destructive leadership. The paper then presents a logical plan to monitor and remediate these “TOXIC” conditions in the physical environment. This paper is original in its angle to which social behaviour is juxtaposed against physical environment. In particular, by examining the negative interface, it informs managers of the risks to avoid and therefore identifies the baseline for which the physical workplace must be managed. It also makes a practical contribution by its development of a self-auditing framework to avoid toxic workplaces.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992957722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/14630011211285834

DO - 10.1108/14630011211285834

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 171

EP - 181

JO - Journal of Corporate Real Estate

JF - Journal of Corporate Real Estate

SN - 1463-001X

IS - 3

ER -