'Tough love and tears': Learning doctoral writing in the sciences

Claire Aitchison, Janice Catterall, Pauline Ross, Shelley Burgin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Contemporary changes to the doctorate mean student researchers are likely to be expected to write differently, write more and more often, and yet, despite a growing interest in doctoral education, we still know relatively little about the teaching and learning practices of students and supervisors vis-a-vis doctoral writing. This paper draws from a research study into the writing experiences of higher degree students and their supervisors in one science, health and technology-based university Faculty. The study used surveys, interviews and focus groups to collect information from students and supervisors about their experiences of doctoral writing and their perceptions about its development. By attending to the writing-related pedagogical practices of supervisors, this article explores how doctoral writing can be the stage for the playing out of tensions over changing roles and identities aggravated by contemporary pressures on doctoral education.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)435-447
Number of pages13
JournalHigher Education Research and Development
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

love
science
learning
student
health science
education
experience
university
Teaching
interview
Group

Cite this

Aitchison, Claire ; Catterall, Janice ; Ross, Pauline ; Burgin, Shelley. / 'Tough love and tears' : Learning doctoral writing in the sciences. In: Higher Education Research and Development. 2012 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 435-447.
@article{4d15d53cd514410e8a1f2a348c280460,
title = "'Tough love and tears': Learning doctoral writing in the sciences",
abstract = "Contemporary changes to the doctorate mean student researchers are likely to be expected to write differently, write more and more often, and yet, despite a growing interest in doctoral education, we still know relatively little about the teaching and learning practices of students and supervisors vis-a-vis doctoral writing. This paper draws from a research study into the writing experiences of higher degree students and their supervisors in one science, health and technology-based university Faculty. The study used surveys, interviews and focus groups to collect information from students and supervisors about their experiences of doctoral writing and their perceptions about its development. By attending to the writing-related pedagogical practices of supervisors, this article explores how doctoral writing can be the stage for the playing out of tensions over changing roles and identities aggravated by contemporary pressures on doctoral education.",
author = "Claire Aitchison and Janice Catterall and Pauline Ross and Shelley Burgin",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2011.559195",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "435--447",
journal = "Higher Education Research and Development",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

'Tough love and tears' : Learning doctoral writing in the sciences. / Aitchison, Claire; Catterall, Janice; Ross, Pauline; Burgin, Shelley.

In: Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 31, No. 4, 08.2012, p. 435-447.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Tough love and tears'

T2 - Learning doctoral writing in the sciences

AU - Aitchison, Claire

AU - Catterall, Janice

AU - Ross, Pauline

AU - Burgin, Shelley

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - Contemporary changes to the doctorate mean student researchers are likely to be expected to write differently, write more and more often, and yet, despite a growing interest in doctoral education, we still know relatively little about the teaching and learning practices of students and supervisors vis-a-vis doctoral writing. This paper draws from a research study into the writing experiences of higher degree students and their supervisors in one science, health and technology-based university Faculty. The study used surveys, interviews and focus groups to collect information from students and supervisors about their experiences of doctoral writing and their perceptions about its development. By attending to the writing-related pedagogical practices of supervisors, this article explores how doctoral writing can be the stage for the playing out of tensions over changing roles and identities aggravated by contemporary pressures on doctoral education.

AB - Contemporary changes to the doctorate mean student researchers are likely to be expected to write differently, write more and more often, and yet, despite a growing interest in doctoral education, we still know relatively little about the teaching and learning practices of students and supervisors vis-a-vis doctoral writing. This paper draws from a research study into the writing experiences of higher degree students and their supervisors in one science, health and technology-based university Faculty. The study used surveys, interviews and focus groups to collect information from students and supervisors about their experiences of doctoral writing and their perceptions about its development. By attending to the writing-related pedagogical practices of supervisors, this article explores how doctoral writing can be the stage for the playing out of tensions over changing roles and identities aggravated by contemporary pressures on doctoral education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864621155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2011.559195

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2011.559195

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 435

EP - 447

JO - Higher Education Research and Development

JF - Higher Education Research and Development

SN - 0729-4360

IS - 4

ER -