Tort Law and Climate Change

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review


Tort law presents doctrinal barriers to plaintiffs seeking remedies for climate change harms in common law jurisdictions. However, litigants are likely to persist in pursuing tortious causes of action in the absence of persuasive policy and regulatory alternatives. Ongoing litigation in Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd in New Zealand and Sharma v Minister for Environment in Australia highlights tensions between torts doctrine and climate change litigation in both countries. Regardless of its ultimate outcome, that litigation provides a valuable opportunity to integrate theoretical questions about the legitimacy of judicial lawmaking, and intersectional critical legal perspectives, into the teaching of torts.
Original languageEnglish
JournalUniversity of Queensland Law Journal
Publication statusPublished - 2021


Dive into the research topics of 'Tort Law and Climate Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this