Too poor for transplant: Finance and insurance issues in transplant ethics

Kyle Alexander Laurentine, Katrina A. Bramstedt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Donor organs are a scarce gift. Additionally, transplantation is very expensive and the United States lacks universal health insurance for all citizens. These facts combine to make personal finance and insurance some of the criteria for wait listing at US transplant centers. Previous research has shown that the poor and the uninsured (as well as women and nonwhites) are less likely to receive a transplant. Living donor candidates are also limited by the US insurance system. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of finance and insurance variables on access to transplant and living donation. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study of ethics consultation data contained in a research registry approved by the institutional review board at California Pacific Medical Center. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study analyzes research registry data from a large community hospital in Northern California that serves patients from California, Oregon, and Nevada. The registry data are derived from transplant ethics consultations occurring between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: This study explores the restriction of access to transplantation and of participation in living donation. RESULTS: More than a quarter of all transplant ethics consultation reports described the restriction of transplant-related treatment for reasons rooted in finance or insurance. Individuals on the recipient side and on the donor side were hindered with regard to access. Insurance status and personal ability to pay significantly affect access to transplantation in the United States, and this theme is a frequent feature of ethics consultations at California Pacific Medical Center.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-185
Number of pages8
JournalProgress in Transplantation: the journal for procurement and clinical transplant professionals
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Ethics Consultation
Insurance
Ethics
Transplants
Registries
Transplantation
Research
Tissue Donors
Gift Giving
Aptitude
Insurance Coverage
Living Donors
Research Ethics Committees
Community Hospital
Health Insurance
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Cite this

@article{f5d52a2df2cb4ae682906c0cbd1e67b3,
title = "Too poor for transplant: Finance and insurance issues in transplant ethics",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Donor organs are a scarce gift. Additionally, transplantation is very expensive and the United States lacks universal health insurance for all citizens. These facts combine to make personal finance and insurance some of the criteria for wait listing at US transplant centers. Previous research has shown that the poor and the uninsured (as well as women and nonwhites) are less likely to receive a transplant. Living donor candidates are also limited by the US insurance system. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of finance and insurance variables on access to transplant and living donation. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study of ethics consultation data contained in a research registry approved by the institutional review board at California Pacific Medical Center. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study analyzes research registry data from a large community hospital in Northern California that serves patients from California, Oregon, and Nevada. The registry data are derived from transplant ethics consultations occurring between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: This study explores the restriction of access to transplantation and of participation in living donation. RESULTS: More than a quarter of all transplant ethics consultation reports described the restriction of transplant-related treatment for reasons rooted in finance or insurance. Individuals on the recipient side and on the donor side were hindered with regard to access. Insurance status and personal ability to pay significantly affect access to transplantation in the United States, and this theme is a frequent feature of ethics consultations at California Pacific Medical Center.",
author = "Laurentine, {Kyle Alexander} and Bramstedt, {Katrina A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/152692481002000213",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "178--185",
journal = "Progress in Transplantation",
issn = "0905-9199",
publisher = "InnoVision Communications",
number = "2",

}

Too poor for transplant : Finance and insurance issues in transplant ethics. / Laurentine, Kyle Alexander; Bramstedt, Katrina A.

In: Progress in Transplantation: the journal for procurement and clinical transplant professionals, Vol. 20, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 178-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Too poor for transplant

T2 - Finance and insurance issues in transplant ethics

AU - Laurentine, Kyle Alexander

AU - Bramstedt, Katrina A.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - CONTEXT: Donor organs are a scarce gift. Additionally, transplantation is very expensive and the United States lacks universal health insurance for all citizens. These facts combine to make personal finance and insurance some of the criteria for wait listing at US transplant centers. Previous research has shown that the poor and the uninsured (as well as women and nonwhites) are less likely to receive a transplant. Living donor candidates are also limited by the US insurance system. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of finance and insurance variables on access to transplant and living donation. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study of ethics consultation data contained in a research registry approved by the institutional review board at California Pacific Medical Center. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study analyzes research registry data from a large community hospital in Northern California that serves patients from California, Oregon, and Nevada. The registry data are derived from transplant ethics consultations occurring between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: This study explores the restriction of access to transplantation and of participation in living donation. RESULTS: More than a quarter of all transplant ethics consultation reports described the restriction of transplant-related treatment for reasons rooted in finance or insurance. Individuals on the recipient side and on the donor side were hindered with regard to access. Insurance status and personal ability to pay significantly affect access to transplantation in the United States, and this theme is a frequent feature of ethics consultations at California Pacific Medical Center.

AB - CONTEXT: Donor organs are a scarce gift. Additionally, transplantation is very expensive and the United States lacks universal health insurance for all citizens. These facts combine to make personal finance and insurance some of the criteria for wait listing at US transplant centers. Previous research has shown that the poor and the uninsured (as well as women and nonwhites) are less likely to receive a transplant. Living donor candidates are also limited by the US insurance system. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of finance and insurance variables on access to transplant and living donation. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study of ethics consultation data contained in a research registry approved by the institutional review board at California Pacific Medical Center. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study analyzes research registry data from a large community hospital in Northern California that serves patients from California, Oregon, and Nevada. The registry data are derived from transplant ethics consultations occurring between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: This study explores the restriction of access to transplantation and of participation in living donation. RESULTS: More than a quarter of all transplant ethics consultation reports described the restriction of transplant-related treatment for reasons rooted in finance or insurance. Individuals on the recipient side and on the donor side were hindered with regard to access. Insurance status and personal ability to pay significantly affect access to transplantation in the United States, and this theme is a frequent feature of ethics consultations at California Pacific Medical Center.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955864475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/152692481002000213

DO - 10.1177/152692481002000213

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 178

EP - 185

JO - Progress in Transplantation

JF - Progress in Transplantation

SN - 0905-9199

IS - 2

ER -