Abstract
Although some jurisdictions have abolished the rule from this case, it applies in other jurisdictions. It continues to limit the ability of a person injured from straying stock from being able to successfully claim against the owner of the animal. This article concludes it is time to totally abolish the rule.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 101-130 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | Deakin Law Review |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Time to abolish the rule in Searle v Wallbank for negligence and nuisance claims'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver