Abstract
Although some jurisdictions have abolished the rule from this case, it applies in other jurisdictions. It continues to limit the ability of a person injured from straying stock from being able to successfully claim against the owner of the animal. This article concludes it is time to totally abolish the rule.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-130 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Deakin Law Review |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |