Time for the Law to take internet geolocation technologies seriously

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are longstanding assumptions that the Internet operates independently of geographical location, and that it is borderless in nature. After all, sending an e-mail to a person in the office next door is done in the same manner as sending the same e-mail to a person located on the other side of the planet. Similarly, visiting a local website is done in the same manner as visiting a foreign website. The important role these assumptions have played in Internet regulation, 1 as well as more broadly, should not be underestimated. In fact, it could be said that a significant part of the current thinking about matters falling within the scope of Internet regulation takes these assumptions as its point of departure. In particular, these assumptions have guided our thinking on the matters of when a court may exercise jurisdiction over Internet conduct, and which country’s law should govern Internet conduct.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)473-487
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Private International Law
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Internet
Law
e-mail
website
regulation
human being
jurisdiction
time

Cite this

@article{7d950f0712e94ca3870ca41838305caf,
title = "Time for the Law to take internet geolocation technologies seriously",
abstract = "There are longstanding assumptions that the Internet operates independently of geographical location, and that it is borderless in nature. After all, sending an e-mail to a person in the office next door is done in the same manner as sending the same e-mail to a person located on the other side of the planet. Similarly, visiting a local website is done in the same manner as visiting a foreign website. The important role these assumptions have played in Internet regulation, 1 as well as more broadly, should not be underestimated. In fact, it could be said that a significant part of the current thinking about matters falling within the scope of Internet regulation takes these assumptions as its point of departure. In particular, these assumptions have guided our thinking on the matters of when a court may exercise jurisdiction over Internet conduct, and which country’s law should govern Internet conduct.",
author = "Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5235/JPRIVINTL.8.3.473",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "473--487",
journal = "Journal of Private International Law",
issn = "1744-1048",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

Time for the Law to take internet geolocation technologies seriously. / Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: Journal of Private International Law, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.12.2012, p. 473-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time for the Law to take internet geolocation technologies seriously

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - There are longstanding assumptions that the Internet operates independently of geographical location, and that it is borderless in nature. After all, sending an e-mail to a person in the office next door is done in the same manner as sending the same e-mail to a person located on the other side of the planet. Similarly, visiting a local website is done in the same manner as visiting a foreign website. The important role these assumptions have played in Internet regulation, 1 as well as more broadly, should not be underestimated. In fact, it could be said that a significant part of the current thinking about matters falling within the scope of Internet regulation takes these assumptions as its point of departure. In particular, these assumptions have guided our thinking on the matters of when a court may exercise jurisdiction over Internet conduct, and which country’s law should govern Internet conduct.

AB - There are longstanding assumptions that the Internet operates independently of geographical location, and that it is borderless in nature. After all, sending an e-mail to a person in the office next door is done in the same manner as sending the same e-mail to a person located on the other side of the planet. Similarly, visiting a local website is done in the same manner as visiting a foreign website. The important role these assumptions have played in Internet regulation, 1 as well as more broadly, should not be underestimated. In fact, it could be said that a significant part of the current thinking about matters falling within the scope of Internet regulation takes these assumptions as its point of departure. In particular, these assumptions have guided our thinking on the matters of when a court may exercise jurisdiction over Internet conduct, and which country’s law should govern Internet conduct.

U2 - 10.5235/JPRIVINTL.8.3.473

DO - 10.5235/JPRIVINTL.8.3.473

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 473

EP - 487

JO - Journal of Private International Law

JF - Journal of Private International Law

SN - 1744-1048

IS - 3

ER -