Abstract
The New South Wales Court of Appeal's recommendation to abandon the terms 'economic duress' and 'illegitimate pressure' in relation to lawful-act duress claims in the 'Australia & New Zealand Banking Group v Karam' case is discussed. The merits and demerits of the recommendation are analysed, putting four questions to verify the plausibility of the Court's recommendation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-84 |
| Number of pages | 44 |
| Journal | University of Queensland Law Journal |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |