Abstract
The New South Wales Court of Appeal's recommendation to abandon the terms 'economic duress' and 'illegitimate pressure' in relation to lawful-act duress claims in the 'Australia & New Zealand Banking Group v Karam' case is discussed. The merits and demerits of the recommendation are analysed, putting four questions to verify the plausibility of the Court's recommendation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 41-84 |
Number of pages | 44 |
Journal | University of Queensland Law Journal |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |