Throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Four questions on the demise of lawful-act duress in New South Wales

Richard Bigwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The New South Wales Court of Appeal's recommendation to abandon the terms 'economic duress' and 'illegitimate pressure' in relation to lawful-act duress claims in the 'Australia & New Zealand Banking Group v Karam' case is discussed. The merits and demerits of the recommendation are analysed, putting four questions to verify the plausibility of the Court's recommendation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-84
Number of pages44
JournalUniversity of Queensland Law Journal
Volume27
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

baby
banking
appeal
New Zealand
economics
Group

Cite this

@article{f7293bf7d18c4efbae5eef132dd8432e,
title = "Throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Four questions on the demise of lawful-act duress in New South Wales",
abstract = "The New South Wales Court of Appeal's recommendation to abandon the terms 'economic duress' and 'illegitimate pressure' in relation to lawful-act duress claims in the 'Australia & New Zealand Banking Group v Karam' case is discussed. The merits and demerits of the recommendation are analysed, putting four questions to verify the plausibility of the Court's recommendation.",
author = "Richard Bigwood",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "41--84",
journal = "University of Queensland Law Journal",
issn = "0083-4041",
publisher = "University of Queensland Press",
number = "2",

}

Throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Four questions on the demise of lawful-act duress in New South Wales. / Bigwood, Richard.

In: University of Queensland Law Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2008, p. 41-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Four questions on the demise of lawful-act duress in New South Wales

AU - Bigwood, Richard

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The New South Wales Court of Appeal's recommendation to abandon the terms 'economic duress' and 'illegitimate pressure' in relation to lawful-act duress claims in the 'Australia & New Zealand Banking Group v Karam' case is discussed. The merits and demerits of the recommendation are analysed, putting four questions to verify the plausibility of the Court's recommendation.

AB - The New South Wales Court of Appeal's recommendation to abandon the terms 'economic duress' and 'illegitimate pressure' in relation to lawful-act duress claims in the 'Australia & New Zealand Banking Group v Karam' case is discussed. The merits and demerits of the recommendation are analysed, putting four questions to verify the plausibility of the Court's recommendation.

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 41

EP - 84

JO - University of Queensland Law Journal

JF - University of Queensland Law Journal

SN - 0083-4041

IS - 2

ER -