Three Illusions of Modern Politics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Modern political discourse is characterised by three pervasive and harmful illusions: the illusions of control,
desert and revenge. The illusion of control holds that we can manage our social and economic environment to
keep ourselves safe from harm. The illusion of desert holds that in a well governed society people generally get
what they deserve. The illusion of revenge holds that it is beneficial and legitimate to punish those who
transgress legal and social norms. I discuss the role these illusions play in political debates, drawing on work in
social psychology to explain their appeal. I then try to imagine a radically new form of political discourse
based on accepting that we are not in control, people do not get what they deserve and coercion is not the
answer. I argue that this reimagined politics holds important advantages over the current paradigm.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-54
Number of pages12
JournalBond Law Review
Volume30
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

retaliation
desert
politics
Social Norms
appeal
psychology
paradigm
discourse
economics
Society

Cite this

Crowe, Jonathan. / Three Illusions of Modern Politics. In: Bond Law Review. 2018 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 43-54.
@article{624e7fadd63846ed804d4693575b2584,
title = "Three Illusions of Modern Politics",
abstract = "Modern political discourse is characterised by three pervasive and harmful illusions: the illusions of control,desert and revenge. The illusion of control holds that we can manage our social and economic environment tokeep ourselves safe from harm. The illusion of desert holds that in a well governed society people generally getwhat they deserve. The illusion of revenge holds that it is beneficial and legitimate to punish those whotransgress legal and social norms. I discuss the role these illusions play in political debates, drawing on work insocial psychology to explain their appeal. I then try to imagine a radically new form of political discoursebased on accepting that we are not in control, people do not get what they deserve and coercion is not theanswer. I argue that this reimagined politics holds important advantages over the current paradigm.",
author = "Jonathan Crowe",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "43--54",
journal = "Bond Law Review",
issn = "1033-4505",
publisher = "Bond University Press",
number = "1",

}

Crowe, J 2018, 'Three Illusions of Modern Politics' Bond Law Review, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 43-54.

Three Illusions of Modern Politics. / Crowe, Jonathan.

In: Bond Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2018, p. 43-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three Illusions of Modern Politics

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Modern political discourse is characterised by three pervasive and harmful illusions: the illusions of control,desert and revenge. The illusion of control holds that we can manage our social and economic environment tokeep ourselves safe from harm. The illusion of desert holds that in a well governed society people generally getwhat they deserve. The illusion of revenge holds that it is beneficial and legitimate to punish those whotransgress legal and social norms. I discuss the role these illusions play in political debates, drawing on work insocial psychology to explain their appeal. I then try to imagine a radically new form of political discoursebased on accepting that we are not in control, people do not get what they deserve and coercion is not theanswer. I argue that this reimagined politics holds important advantages over the current paradigm.

AB - Modern political discourse is characterised by three pervasive and harmful illusions: the illusions of control,desert and revenge. The illusion of control holds that we can manage our social and economic environment tokeep ourselves safe from harm. The illusion of desert holds that in a well governed society people generally getwhat they deserve. The illusion of revenge holds that it is beneficial and legitimate to punish those whotransgress legal and social norms. I discuss the role these illusions play in political debates, drawing on work insocial psychology to explain their appeal. I then try to imagine a radically new form of political discoursebased on accepting that we are not in control, people do not get what they deserve and coercion is not theanswer. I argue that this reimagined politics holds important advantages over the current paradigm.

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 43

EP - 54

JO - Bond Law Review

JF - Bond Law Review

SN - 1033-4505

IS - 1

ER -