Thinking through Srivijaya: Polycentric networks in traditional Southeast Asia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Extract; The story of Srivijaya begins with a geopolitical preface. Just as all roads once led to Rome, so too maritime trade in Asia converged on the narrow sea route that became known as the Strait of Malacca. Unlike ancient Rome, however, the Malacca Strait has retained its geographical salience at different times in history. One such era was well conveyed by the sixteenth century Portuguese adventurer, Tomé Pires, who wrote shortly after his country’s acquisition of the port city of Malacca: “Whoever is lord of Malacca has his hands on the throat of Venice” (Courtesao 1944). Five centuries later, similar sentiments transpire; only the actors and their cargoes have changed. The lucrative spice trade that enabled the maritime republic of Venice to acquire wealth and power has been replaced by access to energy upon which modern economies depend, not least of which the world’s premier trading nation – the People’s Republic of China (PRC, China). With 80 percent of its imported oil passing through the Strait of Malacca, a chokepoint over which the PRC has no control, it is understandable that President Hu Jintao spoke in 2003 of the “Malacca dilemma” (US DoD 2005). In view of China’s vulnerability to having this maritime lifeline severed, Hu Jintao’s successor, Xi Jinping, has refocused on the “maritime silk road” and the importance of regional “connectivity” 1 (Wu and Zhao 2013; APEC 2014). This not only serves to promote regional prosperity but in light of the “Malacca dilemma” offers a strategic expedient in the vicinity of such a vital sea line of communication.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2nd Global South International Studies Conference (GSCIS)
Place of PublicationUnited States
PublisherISA Services Inc
Pages1-21
Publication statusPublished - 2015
EventISA Global South International Studies Conference: Voices from Outside: Re-shaping International Relations Theory and Practice in an Era of Global Transformation - Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Duration: 8 Jan 201510 Jan 2015
Conference number: 2nd
http://www.isanet.org/Conferences/GSCIS-Bangkok-2015

Conference

ConferenceISA Global South International Studies Conference
Abbreviated titleGSCIS
CountrySingapore
CitySingapore
Period8/01/1510/01/15
Internet address

Fingerprint

Straits
South-East Asia
China
Sentiment
Wealth
Roads
Adventurers
Rome
Spices
Port Cities
Successor
Oil
History
Energy
Maritime Trade
Economy
Silk Road
Route
Prosperity
Asia

Cite this

Dellios, R., & Ferguson, R. J. (2015). Thinking through Srivijaya: Polycentric networks in traditional Southeast Asia. In Proceedings of the 2nd Global South International Studies Conference (GSCIS) (pp. 1-21). United States: ISA Services Inc.
Dellios, Rosita ; Ferguson, R. James. / Thinking through Srivijaya: Polycentric networks in traditional Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the 2nd Global South International Studies Conference (GSCIS). United States : ISA Services Inc, 2015. pp. 1-21
@inproceedings{0fca5881663044f6a77e3bb51512ab2a,
title = "Thinking through Srivijaya: Polycentric networks in traditional Southeast Asia",
abstract = "Extract; The story of Srivijaya begins with a geopolitical preface. Just as all roads once led to Rome, so too maritime trade in Asia converged on the narrow sea route that became known as the Strait of Malacca. Unlike ancient Rome, however, the Malacca Strait has retained its geographical salience at different times in history. One such era was well conveyed by the sixteenth century Portuguese adventurer, Tom{\'e} Pires, who wrote shortly after his country’s acquisition of the port city of Malacca: “Whoever is lord of Malacca has his hands on the throat of Venice” (Courtesao 1944). Five centuries later, similar sentiments transpire; only the actors and their cargoes have changed. The lucrative spice trade that enabled the maritime republic of Venice to acquire wealth and power has been replaced by access to energy upon which modern economies depend, not least of which the world’s premier trading nation – the People’s Republic of China (PRC, China). With 80 percent of its imported oil passing through the Strait of Malacca, a chokepoint over which the PRC has no control, it is understandable that President Hu Jintao spoke in 2003 of the “Malacca dilemma” (US DoD 2005). In view of China’s vulnerability to having this maritime lifeline severed, Hu Jintao’s successor, Xi Jinping, has refocused on the “maritime silk road” and the importance of regional “connectivity” 1 (Wu and Zhao 2013; APEC 2014). This not only serves to promote regional prosperity but in light of the “Malacca dilemma” offers a strategic expedient in the vicinity of such a vital sea line of communication.",
author = "Rosita Dellios and Ferguson, {R. James}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
pages = "1--21",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2nd Global South International Studies Conference (GSCIS)",
publisher = "ISA Services Inc",
address = "United States",

}

Dellios, R & Ferguson, RJ 2015, Thinking through Srivijaya: Polycentric networks in traditional Southeast Asia. in Proceedings of the 2nd Global South International Studies Conference (GSCIS). ISA Services Inc, United States, pp. 1-21, ISA Global South International Studies Conference, Singapore, Singapore, 8/01/15.

Thinking through Srivijaya: Polycentric networks in traditional Southeast Asia. / Dellios, Rosita; Ferguson, R. James.

Proceedings of the 2nd Global South International Studies Conference (GSCIS). United States : ISA Services Inc, 2015. p. 1-21.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Thinking through Srivijaya: Polycentric networks in traditional Southeast Asia

AU - Dellios, Rosita

AU - Ferguson, R. James

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Extract; The story of Srivijaya begins with a geopolitical preface. Just as all roads once led to Rome, so too maritime trade in Asia converged on the narrow sea route that became known as the Strait of Malacca. Unlike ancient Rome, however, the Malacca Strait has retained its geographical salience at different times in history. One such era was well conveyed by the sixteenth century Portuguese adventurer, Tomé Pires, who wrote shortly after his country’s acquisition of the port city of Malacca: “Whoever is lord of Malacca has his hands on the throat of Venice” (Courtesao 1944). Five centuries later, similar sentiments transpire; only the actors and their cargoes have changed. The lucrative spice trade that enabled the maritime republic of Venice to acquire wealth and power has been replaced by access to energy upon which modern economies depend, not least of which the world’s premier trading nation – the People’s Republic of China (PRC, China). With 80 percent of its imported oil passing through the Strait of Malacca, a chokepoint over which the PRC has no control, it is understandable that President Hu Jintao spoke in 2003 of the “Malacca dilemma” (US DoD 2005). In view of China’s vulnerability to having this maritime lifeline severed, Hu Jintao’s successor, Xi Jinping, has refocused on the “maritime silk road” and the importance of regional “connectivity” 1 (Wu and Zhao 2013; APEC 2014). This not only serves to promote regional prosperity but in light of the “Malacca dilemma” offers a strategic expedient in the vicinity of such a vital sea line of communication.

AB - Extract; The story of Srivijaya begins with a geopolitical preface. Just as all roads once led to Rome, so too maritime trade in Asia converged on the narrow sea route that became known as the Strait of Malacca. Unlike ancient Rome, however, the Malacca Strait has retained its geographical salience at different times in history. One such era was well conveyed by the sixteenth century Portuguese adventurer, Tomé Pires, who wrote shortly after his country’s acquisition of the port city of Malacca: “Whoever is lord of Malacca has his hands on the throat of Venice” (Courtesao 1944). Five centuries later, similar sentiments transpire; only the actors and their cargoes have changed. The lucrative spice trade that enabled the maritime republic of Venice to acquire wealth and power has been replaced by access to energy upon which modern economies depend, not least of which the world’s premier trading nation – the People’s Republic of China (PRC, China). With 80 percent of its imported oil passing through the Strait of Malacca, a chokepoint over which the PRC has no control, it is understandable that President Hu Jintao spoke in 2003 of the “Malacca dilemma” (US DoD 2005). In view of China’s vulnerability to having this maritime lifeline severed, Hu Jintao’s successor, Xi Jinping, has refocused on the “maritime silk road” and the importance of regional “connectivity” 1 (Wu and Zhao 2013; APEC 2014). This not only serves to promote regional prosperity but in light of the “Malacca dilemma” offers a strategic expedient in the vicinity of such a vital sea line of communication.

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1

EP - 21

BT - Proceedings of the 2nd Global South International Studies Conference (GSCIS)

PB - ISA Services Inc

CY - United States

ER -

Dellios R, Ferguson RJ. Thinking through Srivijaya: Polycentric networks in traditional Southeast Asia. In Proceedings of the 2nd Global South International Studies Conference (GSCIS). United States: ISA Services Inc. 2015. p. 1-21