The WTO solution for investor-state disputes

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Investment arbitration is in a constant state of flux. The latest instances of expropriation have triggered an academic debate revolving around the possibility of WTO law becoming directly applicable to investment treaties such as Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) or Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). This paper explores the nexus between host state obligations under BITs/FTAs on the one hand and the remedies available under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) on the other hand. The paper argues that remedies available under WTO law are of limited scope and at the most would play only a supplementary role to investment arbitration. The author reaches the conclusion that in the foreseeable future, claims under the WTO DSU would remain an exclusive domain of state-to-state dispute settlement until the DSU is amended to allow private claims.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLaw, governance and world order
EditorsSylvia Kierkegaard, Mikael Kierkegaard
Place of Publicationonline
PublisherInternational Association of IT Lawyers
Pages75-85
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)9788799485420
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

WTO
investor
treaty
arbitration
free trade
remedies
expropriation
Law
obligation

Cite this

Ghori, U. H. (2012). The WTO solution for investor-state disputes. In S. Kierkegaard, & M. Kierkegaard (Eds.), Law, governance and world order (pp. 75-85). online: International Association of IT Lawyers.
Ghori, Umair Hafeez . / The WTO solution for investor-state disputes. Law, governance and world order. editor / Sylvia Kierkegaard ; Mikael Kierkegaard. online : International Association of IT Lawyers, 2012. pp. 75-85
@inbook{81c3fa00ad964ac2b1a6df267e0575a6,
title = "The WTO solution for investor-state disputes",
abstract = "Investment arbitration is in a constant state of flux. The latest instances of expropriation have triggered an academic debate revolving around the possibility of WTO law becoming directly applicable to investment treaties such as Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) or Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). This paper explores the nexus between host state obligations under BITs/FTAs on the one hand and the remedies available under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) on the other hand. The paper argues that remedies available under WTO law are of limited scope and at the most would play only a supplementary role to investment arbitration. The author reaches the conclusion that in the foreseeable future, claims under the WTO DSU would remain an exclusive domain of state-to-state dispute settlement until the DSU is amended to allow private claims.",
author = "Ghori, {Umair Hafeez}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9788799485420",
pages = "75--85",
editor = "Kierkegaard, {Sylvia } and Mikael Kierkegaard",
booktitle = "Law, governance and world order",
publisher = "International Association of IT Lawyers",

}

Ghori, UH 2012, The WTO solution for investor-state disputes. in S Kierkegaard & M Kierkegaard (eds), Law, governance and world order. International Association of IT Lawyers, online, pp. 75-85.

The WTO solution for investor-state disputes. / Ghori, Umair Hafeez .

Law, governance and world order. ed. / Sylvia Kierkegaard; Mikael Kierkegaard. online : International Association of IT Lawyers, 2012. p. 75-85.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The WTO solution for investor-state disputes

AU - Ghori, Umair Hafeez

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Investment arbitration is in a constant state of flux. The latest instances of expropriation have triggered an academic debate revolving around the possibility of WTO law becoming directly applicable to investment treaties such as Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) or Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). This paper explores the nexus between host state obligations under BITs/FTAs on the one hand and the remedies available under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) on the other hand. The paper argues that remedies available under WTO law are of limited scope and at the most would play only a supplementary role to investment arbitration. The author reaches the conclusion that in the foreseeable future, claims under the WTO DSU would remain an exclusive domain of state-to-state dispute settlement until the DSU is amended to allow private claims.

AB - Investment arbitration is in a constant state of flux. The latest instances of expropriation have triggered an academic debate revolving around the possibility of WTO law becoming directly applicable to investment treaties such as Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) or Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). This paper explores the nexus between host state obligations under BITs/FTAs on the one hand and the remedies available under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) on the other hand. The paper argues that remedies available under WTO law are of limited scope and at the most would play only a supplementary role to investment arbitration. The author reaches the conclusion that in the foreseeable future, claims under the WTO DSU would remain an exclusive domain of state-to-state dispute settlement until the DSU is amended to allow private claims.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9788799485420

SP - 75

EP - 85

BT - Law, governance and world order

A2 - Kierkegaard, Sylvia

A2 - Kierkegaard, Mikael

PB - International Association of IT Lawyers

CY - online

ER -

Ghori UH. The WTO solution for investor-state disputes. In Kierkegaard S, Kierkegaard M, editors, Law, governance and world order. online: International Association of IT Lawyers. 2012. p. 75-85