The Trade Practices Act: A hard act to follow? Online consumers and the new Australian consumer law landscape

Dan Svantesson, Roger Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

As online traders have been poor at developing consumer trust in e-commerce, the law plays a crucial role in creating such trust. At the start of 2010, we published a paper outlining a model to serve as an international best practice standard for the protection of e-comm erce consumers. In this article, which was written with the assistance of a generous grant from the auDA Foundation, we have applied that best practice standard to assess how effectively protected Australian e-consumers are under Australia's recently reformed consumer law landscape. We focus on two areas of central importance to the effective protection of e-consumers in which Australian law fails to provide adequate protection. First, the law must ensure that consumers are afforded access to appropriate information. Second, it is of fundamental importance that the law caters for access to appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-116
Number of pages32
JournalJames Cook University Law Review
Volume20
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2013

Fingerprint

act
Law
best practice
electronic business
grant
assistance

Cite this

@article{9f64ac2e5aee47068a113508808167a0,
title = "The Trade Practices Act: A hard act to follow? Online consumers and the new Australian consumer law landscape",
abstract = "As online traders have been poor at developing consumer trust in e-commerce, the law plays a crucial role in creating such trust. At the start of 2010, we published a paper outlining a model to serve as an international best practice standard for the protection of e-comm erce consumers. In this article, which was written with the assistance of a generous grant from the auDA Foundation, we have applied that best practice standard to assess how effectively protected Australian e-consumers are under Australia's recently reformed consumer law landscape. We focus on two areas of central importance to the effective protection of e-consumers in which Australian law fails to provide adequate protection. First, the law must ensure that consumers are afforded access to appropriate information. Second, it is of fundamental importance that the law caters for access to appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.",
author = "Dan Svantesson and Roger Clarke",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "85--116",
journal = "James Cook University Law Review",
issn = "1321-1072",

}

The Trade Practices Act : A hard act to follow? Online consumers and the new Australian consumer law landscape. / Svantesson, Dan; Clarke, Roger.

In: James Cook University Law Review, Vol. 20, 01.12.2013, p. 85-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Trade Practices Act

T2 - A hard act to follow? Online consumers and the new Australian consumer law landscape

AU - Svantesson, Dan

AU - Clarke, Roger

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - As online traders have been poor at developing consumer trust in e-commerce, the law plays a crucial role in creating such trust. At the start of 2010, we published a paper outlining a model to serve as an international best practice standard for the protection of e-comm erce consumers. In this article, which was written with the assistance of a generous grant from the auDA Foundation, we have applied that best practice standard to assess how effectively protected Australian e-consumers are under Australia's recently reformed consumer law landscape. We focus on two areas of central importance to the effective protection of e-consumers in which Australian law fails to provide adequate protection. First, the law must ensure that consumers are afforded access to appropriate information. Second, it is of fundamental importance that the law caters for access to appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.

AB - As online traders have been poor at developing consumer trust in e-commerce, the law plays a crucial role in creating such trust. At the start of 2010, we published a paper outlining a model to serve as an international best practice standard for the protection of e-comm erce consumers. In this article, which was written with the assistance of a generous grant from the auDA Foundation, we have applied that best practice standard to assess how effectively protected Australian e-consumers are under Australia's recently reformed consumer law landscape. We focus on two areas of central importance to the effective protection of e-consumers in which Australian law fails to provide adequate protection. First, the law must ensure that consumers are afforded access to appropriate information. Second, it is of fundamental importance that the law caters for access to appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 85

EP - 116

JO - James Cook University Law Review

JF - James Cook University Law Review

SN - 1321-1072

ER -