The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration

PM Bossuyt, JB Reitsma, DE Bruns, CA Gatsonis, PP Glasziou, LM Irwig, D Moher, D Rennie, Henrica CW de Vet, JG Lijmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

748 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results.

A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present.

This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability.

The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in healthcare.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-18
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Chemistry
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2003
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Bossuyt, PM., Reitsma, JB., Bruns, DE., Gatsonis, CA., Glasziou, PP., Irwig, LM., ... Lijmer, JG. (2003). The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Clinical Chemistry, 49(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1373/49.1.7
Bossuyt, PM ; Reitsma, JB ; Bruns, DE ; Gatsonis, CA ; Glasziou, PP ; Irwig, LM ; Moher, D ; Rennie, D ; de Vet, Henrica CW ; Lijmer, JG. / The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy : Explanation and elaboration. In: Clinical Chemistry. 2003 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 7-18.
@article{e244c1c4d3e1465a87163c673b25aa8a,
title = "The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration",
abstract = "The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results.A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present.This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability.The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in healthcare.",
author = "PM Bossuyt and JB Reitsma and DE Bruns and CA Gatsonis and PP Glasziou and LM Irwig and D Moher and D Rennie and {de Vet}, {Henrica CW} and JG Lijmer",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1373/49.1.7",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "7--18",
journal = "Clinical Chemistry",
issn = "0009-9147",
publisher = "AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY",
number = "1",

}

Bossuyt, PM, Reitsma, JB, Bruns, DE, Gatsonis, CA, Glasziou, PP, Irwig, LM, Moher, D, Rennie, D, de Vet, HCW & Lijmer, JG 2003, 'The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration' Clinical Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1373/49.1.7

The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy : Explanation and elaboration. / Bossuyt, PM; Reitsma, JB; Bruns, DE; Gatsonis, CA; Glasziou, PP; Irwig, LM; Moher, D; Rennie, D; de Vet, Henrica CW; Lijmer, JG.

In: Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.2003, p. 7-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy

T2 - Explanation and elaboration

AU - Bossuyt, PM

AU - Reitsma, JB

AU - Bruns, DE

AU - Gatsonis, CA

AU - Glasziou, PP

AU - Irwig, LM

AU - Moher, D

AU - Rennie, D

AU - de Vet, Henrica CW

AU - Lijmer, JG

PY - 2003/1

Y1 - 2003/1

N2 - The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results.A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present.This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability.The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in healthcare.

AB - The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results.A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present.This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability.The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in healthcare.

U2 - 10.1373/49.1.7

DO - 10.1373/49.1.7

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 7

EP - 18

JO - Clinical Chemistry

JF - Clinical Chemistry

SN - 0009-9147

IS - 1

ER -