The standard of care in negligence: the elderly defendant with dementia in Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

To date, there are no reported cases addressing negligent acts or omissions committed by an elderly defendant with dementia. Demographic and epidemiological data indicate that it is a question of when, rather than if, the courts encounter a defendant with these characteristics. This paper seeks to explore the options open to the courts in dealing with such a defendant, by examining the modifications considered to the objective'reasonable person'test to determine the appropriate standard of care, including defendants with mental illness, physical incapacity, and child defendants, each of which class of defendant bears similarities to an elderly defendant with dementia. The paper argues that while extending the existing law relating to the liability of mentally ill defendants may prima facie appear to be an attractive option, it is an area of law which is overdue for reform in and of itself, and extending it to apply to elderly defendants with dementia should be resisted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-133
Number of pages15
JournalCanberra Law Review
Volume10
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dementia
Law
mental illness
liability
reform
human being

Cite this

@article{4cb97417a75f49959e7a1f70ffc5f88b,
title = "The standard of care in negligence: the elderly defendant with dementia in Australia",
abstract = "To date, there are no reported cases addressing negligent acts or omissions committed by an elderly defendant with dementia. Demographic and epidemiological data indicate that it is a question of when, rather than if, the courts encounter a defendant with these characteristics. This paper seeks to explore the options open to the courts in dealing with such a defendant, by examining the modifications considered to the objective'reasonable person'test to determine the appropriate standard of care, including defendants with mental illness, physical incapacity, and child defendants, each of which class of defendant bears similarities to an elderly defendant with dementia. The paper argues that while extending the existing law relating to the liability of mentally ill defendants may prima facie appear to be an attractive option, it is an area of law which is overdue for reform in and of itself, and extending it to apply to elderly defendants with dementia should be resisted.",
author = "Bonython, {Wendy Elizabeth}",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "119--133",
journal = "Canberra Law Review",
issn = "1320-6702",
number = "2",

}

The standard of care in negligence: the elderly defendant with dementia in Australia. / Bonython, Wendy Elizabeth.

In: Canberra Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2011, p. 119-133.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The standard of care in negligence: the elderly defendant with dementia in Australia

AU - Bonython, Wendy Elizabeth

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - To date, there are no reported cases addressing negligent acts or omissions committed by an elderly defendant with dementia. Demographic and epidemiological data indicate that it is a question of when, rather than if, the courts encounter a defendant with these characteristics. This paper seeks to explore the options open to the courts in dealing with such a defendant, by examining the modifications considered to the objective'reasonable person'test to determine the appropriate standard of care, including defendants with mental illness, physical incapacity, and child defendants, each of which class of defendant bears similarities to an elderly defendant with dementia. The paper argues that while extending the existing law relating to the liability of mentally ill defendants may prima facie appear to be an attractive option, it is an area of law which is overdue for reform in and of itself, and extending it to apply to elderly defendants with dementia should be resisted.

AB - To date, there are no reported cases addressing negligent acts or omissions committed by an elderly defendant with dementia. Demographic and epidemiological data indicate that it is a question of when, rather than if, the courts encounter a defendant with these characteristics. This paper seeks to explore the options open to the courts in dealing with such a defendant, by examining the modifications considered to the objective'reasonable person'test to determine the appropriate standard of care, including defendants with mental illness, physical incapacity, and child defendants, each of which class of defendant bears similarities to an elderly defendant with dementia. The paper argues that while extending the existing law relating to the liability of mentally ill defendants may prima facie appear to be an attractive option, it is an area of law which is overdue for reform in and of itself, and extending it to apply to elderly defendants with dementia should be resisted.

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 119

EP - 133

JO - Canberra Law Review

JF - Canberra Law Review

SN - 1320-6702

IS - 2

ER -