The self-regulatory model of illness and adjustment outcomes in Hepatitis C

Simon Langston, Mark S. Edwards, Michael Lyvers, Peta Stapleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates the ability of illness perceptions and coping strategies, primary features of the self-regulatory model of illness (SRM), which has been utilized in several related chronic disease studies to predict adjustment outcomes among individuals diagnosed with hepatitis C (HCV; Hagger & Orbell, 2003; Leventhal, Diefenbach, & Leventhal, 1992). The study utilized the 8-component Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ) and the brief COPE as a measure of coping strategies (Broadbent, Petrie, Main, & Weinman, 2006; Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989). Individuals diagnosed with HCV (n = 126) completed online questionnaires assessing illness perceptions, coping strategies, and 3 adjustment outcomes (depression, physical health, and life satisfaction). Hierarchical multiple regressions indicated that illness perceptions and coping strategies predicted adjustment across the depression, physical health, and life satisfaction criterion variables. Illness identity accounted for significant variance across depression and physical health outcomes. Personal control made significant contributions to predicting depression, physical health, and life satisfaction outcomes. Illness coherence and emotional responses to HCV predicted depression outcomes, whereas illness timeline accounted for variance in life satisfaction. Maladaptive coping made significant contributions to predicting depression and life satisfaction outcomes. Adaptive coping predicted significant variance in life satisfaction. Results provide support for the inclusion of the SRM within therapeutic models for individuals presenting with HCV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-326
Number of pages10
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Volume48
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Cite this

@article{f3a1fdbdc2c14b409c94449796b0868a,
title = "The self-regulatory model of illness and adjustment outcomes in Hepatitis C",
abstract = "This study investigates the ability of illness perceptions and coping strategies, primary features of the self-regulatory model of illness (SRM), which has been utilized in several related chronic disease studies to predict adjustment outcomes among individuals diagnosed with hepatitis C (HCV; Hagger & Orbell, 2003; Leventhal, Diefenbach, & Leventhal, 1992). The study utilized the 8-component Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ) and the brief COPE as a measure of coping strategies (Broadbent, Petrie, Main, & Weinman, 2006; Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989). Individuals diagnosed with HCV (n = 126) completed online questionnaires assessing illness perceptions, coping strategies, and 3 adjustment outcomes (depression, physical health, and life satisfaction). Hierarchical multiple regressions indicated that illness perceptions and coping strategies predicted adjustment across the depression, physical health, and life satisfaction criterion variables. Illness identity accounted for significant variance across depression and physical health outcomes. Personal control made significant contributions to predicting depression, physical health, and life satisfaction outcomes. Illness coherence and emotional responses to HCV predicted depression outcomes, whereas illness timeline accounted for variance in life satisfaction. Maladaptive coping made significant contributions to predicting depression and life satisfaction outcomes. Adaptive coping predicted significant variance in life satisfaction. Results provide support for the inclusion of the SRM within therapeutic models for individuals presenting with HCV.",
author = "Simon Langston and Edwards, {Mark S.} and Michael Lyvers and Peta Stapleton",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pro0000136",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "317--326",
journal = "Professional Psychology: Research and Practice",
issn = "0735-7028",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

The self-regulatory model of illness and adjustment outcomes in Hepatitis C. / Langston, Simon; Edwards, Mark S.; Lyvers, Michael; Stapleton, Peta.

In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 48, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 317-326.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The self-regulatory model of illness and adjustment outcomes in Hepatitis C

AU - Langston, Simon

AU - Edwards, Mark S.

AU - Lyvers, Michael

AU - Stapleton, Peta

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - This study investigates the ability of illness perceptions and coping strategies, primary features of the self-regulatory model of illness (SRM), which has been utilized in several related chronic disease studies to predict adjustment outcomes among individuals diagnosed with hepatitis C (HCV; Hagger & Orbell, 2003; Leventhal, Diefenbach, & Leventhal, 1992). The study utilized the 8-component Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ) and the brief COPE as a measure of coping strategies (Broadbent, Petrie, Main, & Weinman, 2006; Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989). Individuals diagnosed with HCV (n = 126) completed online questionnaires assessing illness perceptions, coping strategies, and 3 adjustment outcomes (depression, physical health, and life satisfaction). Hierarchical multiple regressions indicated that illness perceptions and coping strategies predicted adjustment across the depression, physical health, and life satisfaction criterion variables. Illness identity accounted for significant variance across depression and physical health outcomes. Personal control made significant contributions to predicting depression, physical health, and life satisfaction outcomes. Illness coherence and emotional responses to HCV predicted depression outcomes, whereas illness timeline accounted for variance in life satisfaction. Maladaptive coping made significant contributions to predicting depression and life satisfaction outcomes. Adaptive coping predicted significant variance in life satisfaction. Results provide support for the inclusion of the SRM within therapeutic models for individuals presenting with HCV.

AB - This study investigates the ability of illness perceptions and coping strategies, primary features of the self-regulatory model of illness (SRM), which has been utilized in several related chronic disease studies to predict adjustment outcomes among individuals diagnosed with hepatitis C (HCV; Hagger & Orbell, 2003; Leventhal, Diefenbach, & Leventhal, 1992). The study utilized the 8-component Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire (BIPQ) and the brief COPE as a measure of coping strategies (Broadbent, Petrie, Main, & Weinman, 2006; Carver, Scheier, & Weintraub, 1989). Individuals diagnosed with HCV (n = 126) completed online questionnaires assessing illness perceptions, coping strategies, and 3 adjustment outcomes (depression, physical health, and life satisfaction). Hierarchical multiple regressions indicated that illness perceptions and coping strategies predicted adjustment across the depression, physical health, and life satisfaction criterion variables. Illness identity accounted for significant variance across depression and physical health outcomes. Personal control made significant contributions to predicting depression, physical health, and life satisfaction outcomes. Illness coherence and emotional responses to HCV predicted depression outcomes, whereas illness timeline accounted for variance in life satisfaction. Maladaptive coping made significant contributions to predicting depression and life satisfaction outcomes. Adaptive coping predicted significant variance in life satisfaction. Results provide support for the inclusion of the SRM within therapeutic models for individuals presenting with HCV.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017362953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pro0000136

DO - 10.1037/pro0000136

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 317

EP - 326

JO - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

JF - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

SN - 0735-7028

IS - 5

ER -