The selection of a dean in an academic environment: Are we getting what we deserve?

Michael Harvey, James B. Shaw, Ruth McPhail, Anthony Erickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the development of the paper was due to the seemingly endless searching for deans to replace the former dean of three to four years. Design/methodology/approach: The paper was developed around the present relevant secondary data. Findings: The key findings of the paper were that deans were being replaced due to the difference in expectation of the various constituents (e.g. students, faculty, administration, parents) in the performance of the SBA. Research limitations/implications: Limitations of the study were not providing primary data to support the theory based hypotheses of the study. Practical implications: Deans need to recognize that there will be conflicting expectations relative to the performance of the dean and that deans have a very short time to effectuate change in academic organizations. Social implications: Not having such high turnover in dean's positions should provide the stability of management to bring about change need in institutions of higher education. Originality/value: Identification of key mistakes made by deans as well as the mistakes made by faculty undermine the performance of deans.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-37
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Educational Management
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

performance
turnover
parents
present
methodology
management
Values
education
student
time
Turnover
Design methodology
Secondary data

Cite this

@article{a7e4809f9dc74392be78d1327f46fca1,
title = "The selection of a dean in an academic environment: Are we getting what we deserve?",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of the development of the paper was due to the seemingly endless searching for deans to replace the former dean of three to four years. Design/methodology/approach: The paper was developed around the present relevant secondary data. Findings: The key findings of the paper were that deans were being replaced due to the difference in expectation of the various constituents (e.g. students, faculty, administration, parents) in the performance of the SBA. Research limitations/implications: Limitations of the study were not providing primary data to support the theory based hypotheses of the study. Practical implications: Deans need to recognize that there will be conflicting expectations relative to the performance of the dean and that deans have a very short time to effectuate change in academic organizations. Social implications: Not having such high turnover in dean's positions should provide the stability of management to bring about change need in institutions of higher education. Originality/value: Identification of key mistakes made by deans as well as the mistakes made by faculty undermine the performance of deans.",
author = "Michael Harvey and Shaw, {James B.} and Ruth McPhail and Anthony Erickson",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1108/09513541311289800",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "19--37",
journal = "International Journal of Educational Management",
issn = "0951-354X",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

The selection of a dean in an academic environment : Are we getting what we deserve? / Harvey, Michael; Shaw, James B.; McPhail, Ruth; Erickson, Anthony.

In: International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 19-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The selection of a dean in an academic environment

T2 - Are we getting what we deserve?

AU - Harvey, Michael

AU - Shaw, James B.

AU - McPhail, Ruth

AU - Erickson, Anthony

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of the development of the paper was due to the seemingly endless searching for deans to replace the former dean of three to four years. Design/methodology/approach: The paper was developed around the present relevant secondary data. Findings: The key findings of the paper were that deans were being replaced due to the difference in expectation of the various constituents (e.g. students, faculty, administration, parents) in the performance of the SBA. Research limitations/implications: Limitations of the study were not providing primary data to support the theory based hypotheses of the study. Practical implications: Deans need to recognize that there will be conflicting expectations relative to the performance of the dean and that deans have a very short time to effectuate change in academic organizations. Social implications: Not having such high turnover in dean's positions should provide the stability of management to bring about change need in institutions of higher education. Originality/value: Identification of key mistakes made by deans as well as the mistakes made by faculty undermine the performance of deans.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of the development of the paper was due to the seemingly endless searching for deans to replace the former dean of three to four years. Design/methodology/approach: The paper was developed around the present relevant secondary data. Findings: The key findings of the paper were that deans were being replaced due to the difference in expectation of the various constituents (e.g. students, faculty, administration, parents) in the performance of the SBA. Research limitations/implications: Limitations of the study were not providing primary data to support the theory based hypotheses of the study. Practical implications: Deans need to recognize that there will be conflicting expectations relative to the performance of the dean and that deans have a very short time to effectuate change in academic organizations. Social implications: Not having such high turnover in dean's positions should provide the stability of management to bring about change need in institutions of higher education. Originality/value: Identification of key mistakes made by deans as well as the mistakes made by faculty undermine the performance of deans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872339009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/09513541311289800

DO - 10.1108/09513541311289800

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 19

EP - 37

JO - International Journal of Educational Management

JF - International Journal of Educational Management

SN - 0951-354X

IS - 1

ER -